NAVIN CHAWLA
Honey Chandel @ Honi Pal – Appellant
Versus
Lovely Pal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)
I.A. 5962/2023 & O.A. 31/2023
1. The above application, being I.A. 5962/2023, has been filed seeking condonation of 175 days delay in filing the above appeal, being O.A. 31/2023, which in turn challenges the order dated 07.09.2022 passed by the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial), closing the right of the defendant nos.1 and 2/applicants/appellants herein to file their written statement.
2. In the appeal, it is contended that the suit itself is not properly instituted inasmuch as the plaintiffs have not affixed the ad valorem Court Fee. It is further contended that the parties, being brothers and sisters, were trying to amicably resolve their disputes and for this reason, there was a delay in filing of the written statement.
3. It is further contended that the defendant no.2 is not well and it was he who was to instruct the counsel for preparing the written statement. He was in depression and got his leg fractured due to a road accident.
4. I am not impressed with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the defendant nos.1 and 2/appellants/applicants.
5. As far as the submission of non affixation of proper Court Fee on the plaint is concer
Condonation of delay in filing an appeal or written statement requires acceptable reasons and supporting conduct, and laxity in defending a suit may not be condoned.
The main legal point established is that the appellant's conduct was not negligent, and she was diligent in defending the proceedings, influenced by the conduct of her counsel.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the time limit for filing a written statement under the Civil Procedure Code should be treated as directory, and the court should balance the ....
The Commercial Courts Act brings about a substantial change in the provisions relating to the period of filing of the written statement and the power of the Court to condone the delay in filing of th....
The court emphasized the importance of complying with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the Commercial Courts Act 2015, regarding the filing of written statements and the exten....
The law regarding the condonation of delay requires a satisfactory explanation, and negligence or lack of diligence renders an application for delay condonation unjustifiable.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in granting or refusing permission to file the written statement, emphasizing the need to establish sufficient cause and ....
In partition suits between elderly step-brothers, 58-day delay in written statement condoned as exceptional case warranting defendant's pleadings for fair trial, avoiding defective decrees and prolon....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the time for filing a written statement should be reckoned from the date of the order disposing of the application under Order VII Rule 11 of ....
The court may condone delay in filing documents if there are genuine reasons, such as the petitioner's young age, difficulties in understanding legal procedures, and the complex nature of the issues ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.