Pritkaran Narang vs Vikramjeet Singh - 2023 Supreme(Del) 4439

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 4439

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, MANOJ JAIN
Pritkaran Narang – Appellant
Versus
Vikramjeet Singh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Nishchal Joshi, Advocate with appellant in person, for the Appellant.
Mr. Devesh Dubey with Mr.Vikramjeet Singh, Advocates, for the Respondent. Respondent (through V.C.)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.22761/2023 (exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CM APPL.22759/2023 (for condonation of delay in filing)

There is an application seeking condonation of delay of six days. Appellant has been able to show reasonable cause for condonation thereof.

Accordingly, the application is allowed. The delay of six days in filing the appeal is condoned.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 123/2023 & CM APPL.22760/2023 (stay)

1. Appellant impugns order dated 07.02.2023, whereby the application of the appellant seeking recall of order dated 14.10.2019 whereby her right to file written statement was closed, has been dismissed and the learned Family Court did not condone the delay in filing the written statement.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has been very vigilant and was misled by her counsel and thus the written statement could not be submitted within time. She submits that she has also filed a complaint before the Bar Council of Delhi against the counsel in which notice has already been issued to her erstwhile counsel.

3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Mr. Devesh D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document