Back
NAJMI WAZIRI, VIKAS MAHAJAN
Vidya Bharati School – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Najmi Waziri, J. (Oral)
The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).
1. This appeal impugns the order dated 25.07.2018 passed in W.P.(C) 7700/2018, which has dismissed the appellant's writ petition, in which it had impugned the directions issued by the Directorate of Education (`DOE'), GNCTD, requiring the school to pay arrears of salaries of employees in terms of the 6th Pay Commission.
2. The school had raised two contentions, one of them being that the directions of the DOE were not applicable to it because the school teachers at a staff meeting had agreed to forgo their arrears of enhanced pay. Therefore, the same could not be sought by any of the teachers; all the more because the school had not enhanced its fees nor collected the same for paying the enhanced salaries. The school claimed that it did not have the financial wherewithal to pay the arrears. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Staff Committee had duly understood and appreciated the school's financial incapacity and they had, therefore, agreed to forego enhanced salaries for all times. This contention was rejected by the DOE and rightly so, on the gro
Private school employees are entitled to salaries and benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC as mandated by the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, and coercion faced by employees to waive their rights is ....
The obligation of the Management Committee to observe the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act and the irrelevance of financial hardship for non-compliance with statutory mandates.
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools to align salaries of their employees with those of corresponding positions in government institutions, regardless of the school's financial sta....
A court order finalizing the liability of a private unaided school to pay salary arrears as per the 6th Pay Commission is binding and cannot be revisited through subsequent interlocutory applications....
Employers have a statutory obligation to revise salaries and emoluments under Pay Commissions, and the defense of delay and laches cannot be raised to deny the benefits accruing therefrom.
Claims arising from CPC recommendations are distinct and must be implemented by the employer, emphasizing the need for reasonable diligence in pursuing claims and restricting arrears to three years p....
State Governments are not bound by Central Pay Commission recommendations; administrative discretion prevails in financial matters regarding salary claims.
The right to salary is constitutional, but the government can deny arrears based on financial constraints, especially when revised pay scales have been accepted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
