KARDAK ETE
All Arunachal Pradesh Elementary Teachers Associations (AAPETA) – Appellant
Versus
State Of AP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. A.K. Purkayastha, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. I. Chowdhury, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. T. Tagum, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department, representing the State respondents.
2. By filing these writ petitions, the petitioners have assailed the decision of the respondent authorities pertains to Arrear Salary for the period w.e.f. 01.04.1998 to 31.03.2013 and the decision in fixing the Pay Scale notionally from the stage of 5th CPC w.e.f 01.04.1998 without Arrear Salary as illegal and prayed for a direction to the respondent authorities for payment of Arrear Salary of Primary/Elementary Teachers serving under the Education Department, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh w.e.f 01.04.1998 to 31.03.2013, as per the 5th Central Pay Commission.
3. In view of the facts and relief sought for in the two writ petitions being identical, both were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common judgment and order.
4. The WP(C) No. 151/2018 has been filed by the petitioners, 6(six) in numbers, who are serving as Primary/Elementary Teachers in the Education Department, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. WP(C) 466/2022 has been filed by the
Abul Kalam Azad and Anr. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. reported in (2023) 3 GauLR 116
Digambar Ramchandra Bawaskar Vs. Soma Prabhu Pawar and Ors. reported in 2018(1) MHLJ 169
M.P. Rural Agriculture Extension Officers Association-VS-State of M.P. & Anr
Mizanur Rahman Vs. State of Assam and Ors. reported in 2013(2) GauLT 866
Pannalal Ganguly vs. state of Tripura & 2 Ors. reported in AIR 1992 GAU 55
Parasmoni Das. Vs. Food Corporation of India reported in (2003) 2 GauLT 514
State of Maharashtra & Anr. -VS-Bhagwan & Others
State of Punjab & Others -VS-Amar Nath Goyal & Others
Union of India and Ors -Vs-C.Chandra Kumar reported in 2021 (5) GauLT 193
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Tarsem Singh reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648
The right to salary is constitutional, but the government can deny arrears based on financial constraints, especially when revised pay scales have been accepted.
State Governments are not bound by Central Pay Commission recommendations; administrative discretion prevails in financial matters regarding salary claims.
Private school employees are entitled to salaries and benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC as mandated by the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, and coercion faced by employees to waive their rights is ....
The court established that primary teachers in municipal schools are entitled to the same higher pay-scale as those in district schools, emphasizing equality in pay for equal work.
Circulars related to pay scales and arrears apply prospectively, and past service benefits are not transferable post-departure from the department.
Continuous service obligates salary payment despite appointment legality, and equal treatment demands non-discriminatory enforcement of employment rights.
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools to align salaries of their employees with those of corresponding positions in government institutions, regardless of the school's financial sta....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.