SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1394

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Gaurang Kanth, JJ.
Lokesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 4721 of 2023
Decided On : 17-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. T.P. Singh, Senior CGC & Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Govt. Pleader, for the UOI.

The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same, on the lines of a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Headnote:

Certiorari - Writ Petition - The court disposed of the petition directing the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same, on the lines of a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the quashing of an impugned order and the release of consequential benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court disposed of the petition directing the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same, on the lines of a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Issues: Petitioner seeking relief through writ petition, applicability of a judgment by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same, on the lines of a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Final Decision: The present petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same, on the lines of a judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, within 8 weeks from today.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks following reliefs:

    "a.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing or setting aside the impugned order dated 11.12.2020 and the appellate order dated 01.11.2021/22.10.2021 to the extent it inflicts 3 punishments upon the Petitioner simultaneously;

    b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to release all consequential benefits of the Petitioner."

2. Learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present petition is fully covered by the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Krushnakant B. Parmar vs. Union of India & Anr., Civil Appeal No. 2106/2012 decided on 15.02.2012.

3. Accordingly, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and take a decision on the same, on the lines of aforesaid judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, within 8 weeks from today.

4. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner with a reasoned order within one week thereafter.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top