SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1609

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Amit Kumar Meena – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7889 of 2023 & CM APPL. 30446 of 2023
Decided On : 31-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Dev Prakash Bhardwaj, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Rahul Kumar Sharma, GP and Insp. Sanjay Kumar, CISF, for the Respondents.

The court emphasized the importance of the respondents deciding on the petitioner's representation within a specified timeframe and communicating the decision with a reasoned order.

Headnote:

certiorari - No Objection Certificate - The court directed the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents, who are then directed to decide within ten days and communicate the decision with a reasoned order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an office memorandum and a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to grant No Objection Certificate and/or technical resignation.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents, who are then directed to decide within ten days and communicate the decision with a reasoned order.

Issues: Petitioner's request for quashing an office memorandum and for the grant of No Objection Certificate and/or technical resignation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on directing the respondents to decide on the petitioner's representation within ten days and communicate the decision with a reasoned order.

Final Decision: The present petition is disposed of, and pending application also stands disposed of. The petitioner is given the option to approach the appropriate forum if aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representation.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide this petition, petitioner is praying as under:

    "(i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing office memorandum dated 31.12.2022 issued by the respondents;

    (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant No Objection Certificate and/or technical resignation to the petitioner and consequently grant all consequential benefits ensuring to the petitioner from the same including providing service book, lien certificate, last pay certificate etc. of petitioner."

2. In view of averments made in the present petition, we hereby direct the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents within two days and on receipt of the same, respondents are directed to decide the same within ten days thereafter. The decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within two days thereafter with a reasoned order.

3. With the aforesaid directions, present petition is disposed of.

4. Pending application also stands disposed of.

5. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representation, he may approach the appropriate forum.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top