SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1289

MINI PUSHKARNA
Sartaj Singh – Appellant
Versus
S. Jagjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Aditi Shastri, Advocate, for the Appellant.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate, for R-6.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)

CM APPLs. 52605/2018, 52606/2018, 3365/2019, 9511/2020 & 9512/2020

1. The aforesaid applications have been filed on behalf of applicant, being the son of deceased appellant praying for bringing the Legal Representatives (LRs) of deceased appellant on record with further prayer for setting aside the abatement of appeal and for bringing on record the LRs of the deceased respondent no. 1 and 3(ii).

2. CM No. 52605/2018 is an application for bringing on record the LRs of the deceased appellant.

3. CM No. 52606/2018 is an application for setting aside the abatement of appeal and for condoning the delay in filing the application for bringing on record the LRs of the deceased appellant.

4. CM No. 3365/2019 is an application for bringing on record the LRs of the deceased respondent no. 1 and 3 (ii).

5. CM No. 9511/2020 is an application for condoning delay in filing the application for bringing on record the LRs of the deceased respondents and for setting aside the abatement on that account.

6. CM No. 9512/2020 is an application for taking on record the amended memo of parties.

7. The applications have been filed on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top