Surinder Dhall vs State of NCT of Delhi

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 1422

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Surinder Dhall – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Jatan Singh, Mr. Tushar Lamba, Mr. Siddharth Singh, Mr. P.S. Rana, Mr. Rajesh Arora and Mr. Harshit Aggarwal, Advocates, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Raguvender Verma, APP for State and ASI Chanderpal, PS Pahar Ganj.
Mr. Bharat Dubey, Ms. Shubhlaxmi Dubey, Ms. Taniya Kapoor and Mr. Rohit B., Advocate, for the Respondent-2.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--These are the petitions seeking anticipatory bail in Case FIR No. 205/2022 under Section 498A/406/354/323/506/509/34 IPC registered at P.S Pahar Ganj.

2. The petitioners were granted interim protection by this court vide order dated 01.06.2022.

3. It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioner Nitin Dhall, husband of respondent/complainant had undertaken to pay the school fees of the child in terms of order dated 23.03.2022 in CRL.REV. 207/2022, passed by the court of learned ASJ, Tis Hazari, Central District.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertake that the petitioner Nitin Dhall will continue to pay total increased school fees subject to the orders passed in the revision petition.

5. Learned APP has informed that charge-sheet in this case has already been filed and since the charge-sheet has been filed the present petitions have become infructuous and the petitioners may move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court.

6. Learned counsel for complainant has also submitted that there is an outstanding of Rupees Seven Lakhs. However, Sh. Jatan Singh, learned counsel for petitioner submits that entire amount h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document