IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Ravi Attkan – Appellant
Versus
State NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Bail Appln. 906 of 2022
Decided On : 20-07-2023
Bail Application - Anticipatory Bail - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed a bail application seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under Sections 376/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code. The charge sheet has been filed, and the trial is ongoing. The complainant alleges harassment and intimidation by the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that since the charge sheet has been filed and the petitioner is attending the trial regularly, there is no need to keep the application pending. The complainant was advised to file appropriate applications for protection if she feels threatened. The court granted bail to the petitioner with specific conditions.
Issues: The issues involved the petitioner's request for anticipatory bail, the complainant's allegations of harassment, and the ongoing trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the filing of the charge sheet, the petitioner's attendance at the trial, and the lack of evidence of misuse of liberty in granting bail. The court also emphasized the complainant's option to seek protection through appropriate applications.
Final Decision: The bail application was disposed of, and the petitioner was granted bail with specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. The instant bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in FIR bearing No. 434/2021 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, North West (Delhi) for offences punishable under Sections 376/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. This Court vide order dated 30.03.2022 granted interim protection to the petitioner which is continuing till date. This is a matter of the record that charge sheet has already been filed and the trial is taking place.
3. Learned APP for the State on instructions confirmed that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is also now attending the trial.
4. The complainant has appeared through VC and states that even after grant of interim protection, the petitioner has been harassing and intimidating her and she wants to file the reply.
5. I consider that since the charge sheet has already been filed and the petitioner is attending the trial regularly, there is no need of keeping this application pending disposal here.
6. The complainant, if has any grievances regarding threatening or intimidating her may file appropriate application before the learned Trial Court or before the authority for the protection of the witnesses.
7. Since the charge sheet has been filed and the trial is taking place and there is nothing on the record to suggest substantially that the petitioner has misused the liberty in any manner, the present application is disposed of and the petitioner be admitted to Court bail on furnishing of personal bond of Rs 20,000/- with a surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court subject to the conditions:
i. The petitioner shall not contact with the complainant/prosecutrix in any manner;
ii. the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person/witnesses acquainted with the facts of the case;
iii. the petitioner shall under no circumstances leave India without prior permission of the learned Trial Court concerned;
iv. the Applicant shall provide his mobile number(s) to the learned Trial Court as well as the Investigating Officer and keep it operational at all times; and
v. In case of a change of residential address and/or mobile number, the Applicant shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/ learned Trial Court concerned by way of an affidavit.
8. In view of the above, the present bail application stands disposed of.
The court considered the stage of the trial, the petitioner's conduct, and the complainant's options for seeking protection in granting bail.
The court considered the likelihood of a lengthy trial and the filing of the charge sheet in granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
The court's decision was based on the confirmation of interim protection and admission to court bail after the charge sheet had been filed and charges framed against the petitioner.
Continuation of anticipatory bail application is unnecessary once charges are filed without arrest; petitioner can seek regular bail.
The main legal point established is the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case involving serious allegations, with specific conditions to ensure cooperation in the investigati....
Grant of interim anticipatory bail and subsequent court bail with specific terms and conditions based on the applicant's cooperation in the investigation.
Granting of anticipatory bail and imposition of conditions to ensure cooperation in the investigation.
Anticipatory bail under Section 438 is granted based on careful evaluation of circumstances, emphasizing personal liberty and the need for judicial discretion.
The court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. based on the nature of injuries and the applicant's cooperation in the investigation, emphasizing that merits of the case are not to be c....
Dishonour of cheque and absconding of the petitioner led to the dismissal of the petition for anticipatory bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.