SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Pallab Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. anticipatory bail application process overview. (Para 1 , 2)
2. charges filed without arrest; no custodial interrogation needed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. disposition of the anticipatory bail petition. (Para 6)
4. option for regular bail application in trials. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 appears through video conferencing.

2. This is an application for anticipatory bail. This Court after recording the submissions of the parties, granted protection vide order dated 23.05.2022 and this protection is being extended from time to time.

3. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State, under instructions from the Investigating Officer, states that the chargesheet has already been filed against the accused/petitioner (herein) for the offence under Sections 354/354(B)/376/313/498A/323/34 IPC and the same has already been committed to the Court of sessions. It has been submitted that the charges are yet to be framed.

4. It is an admitted position that the chargesheet was filed without effecting arrest of the accused.

5. Learned Addl. P.P. for the State under instructions from the Investigating Officer has also stated that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top