IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Padam Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
Bail Appln. 1303 of 2023
Decided On : 21-04-2023
Bail - Criminal Law - The court granted bail to the accused in a case involving charges under section 307 IPC, considering the length of time the accused had been in custody and the fact that the complainant had already been examined.
Fact of the Case:
The accused had been in custody since 15.02.2018 in a case involving charges under section 307 IPC. The complainant alleged that the accused pressured him to provide liquor and stabbed him when he refused.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted bail to the accused, considering the length of time the accused had been in custody and the fact that the complainant had already been examined.
Issues: The main issue was whether the accused should be granted bail despite the serious charges against him.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the length of time the accused had been in custody and the fact that the complainant had already been examined, and granted bail with certain conditions.
Final Decision: The accused was admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with a surety of the like amount, subject to specific conditions.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present application has been moved for grant of bail in case FIR No.55/2018 registered under section 307 IPC at PS Kotwali.
2. Learned counsel for Applicant submits that the accused is in custody since 15.02.2018.
3. The facts in brief are that the FIR was lodged on the statement of Bhagwan Das/complainant wherein he alleged that he resides alongwith the Applicant on a pavement and used to do drugs together. It has been alleged that on the day of incident also the Applicantpressurised the victim to provide liquor and on his refusal, petitioner allegedly stabbed him.
4. After investigation the charge-sheet was filed. The statement of complainant has been recorded before the learned Trial Court. In his statement PW-7 has stated that on the day of incident he had consumed liquor and was standing at Company Bagh, Chandni Chowk and while he was under the influence of liquor he was stabbed on the right side of his chest and right arm.
5. Injured has stated that when the incident happened he was in a drunken condition and the assailant is unknown to him as he had not seen him prior to the incident. The witness was declared hostile. In the cross-examination by the learned APP also the injured did not identify the Applicant.
6. Learner APP has opposed the bail application on the ground that the Applicant is a vagabond and if he is released on bail, he will not attend the trial.
7. I have considered the submissions, learned Sessions Court has also predominantly refused the bail on the ground that he did not surrender after being released on interim bail.
8. Learned Trial Court has also taken note of the blood stains on the T-shirt of the applicant. However, without going into the merits of the case and that the learned Trial Court is yet to appreciate the evidence.
9. In totality taking into account of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2018 and the complainant has already been examined. Applicant is admitted to bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- with a surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial Court, subject to the following conditions:
(a) Applicant shall report to the IO twice in a week on Tuesday and Friday at 04:30 PM at PS Kotwali.
(b) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case;
(c) The Applicant shall provide his/her mobile number(s) to the Investigating Officer and keep it operational at all times;
(d) The Applicant shall drop a PIN on the Google map to ensure that his location is available to the Investigating Officer; and
(e) In case of change of residential address and/or mobile number, the Petitioner shall intimate the same to the Investigating Officer/Court concerned by way of an affidavit.
The court may grant bail to an accused considering the length of time in custody and the progress of the case.
Prolonged pre-trial detention without prior criminal history can be a significant factor in granting bail, provided that conditions are imposed to safeguard the integrity of the trial.
The court may grant bail to a petitioner based on the period of detention, the petitioner's pursuits, and the absence of any other case against the petitioner, while emphasizing that the decision doe....
The court considered the petitioner's personal circumstances, lack of criminal history, and completion of investigation as key factors in granting bail, while also taking into account the lack of opp....
The court considered the totality of facts and circumstances, including contradictory witness testimonies and lack of criminal antecedents, in granting bail to the petitioner.
The court considered the completeness of the investigation, recovery of the weapon, lack of framed charges, and the petitioner's clean antecedents in granting bail under Section 439 Cr. PC.
Bail should ensure the accused's attendance at trial, not serve as punitive action, highlighting the principle of presumption of innocence.
The court denied bail based on the gravity of the charges and substantial corroborating evidence of the applicant's active involvement in the murder.
Point of Law : Rejection of Bail - Several of co-accused are still absconding - There is a likelihood of applicant also jumping bail and flee from justice since many of his associates are yet to be a....
The court emphasized that bail should not be granted if there is a strong likelihood of witness tampering and the accused is charged with a serious offence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.