IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
M.S.Karnik, J.
Santosh Pannalal Chattar - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Application (Bail) No. 475 of 2023 (F)
Decided On : 24-07-2023
BAIL - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - The court granted bail to the applicant charged under sec. 302 IPC, emphasizing the prolonged incarceration of over six years without prior criminal antecedents, the commencement of trial with only two witnesses examined, and the imposition of strict conditions to ensure compliance and prevent tampering with evidence.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant is charged with murder under sec. 302 IPC, having allegedly stabbed the victim during an altercation while drinking on the beach. He has been in custody for over six years, and the trial is ongoing with only two out of 26 witnesses examined.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted the lack of criminal antecedents, the lengthy period of custody, and the ongoing trial process. It concluded that these factors warranted the granting of bail, provided strict conditions were imposed.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the serious nature of the charges, the length of time in custody, and the progress of the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that prolonged incarceration without prior criminal history and the slow pace of the trial justified the granting of bail, while ensuring measures were in place to prevent interference with the trial process.
Final Decision: The application for bail was allowed, with the applicant required to furnish a bond and comply with specific conditions during the trial.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
2. This is an application for bail. The applicant is charged for the offences punishable under sec. 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC, for short). The crime has been registered vide FIR no. 137/2017 with the Calangute Police Staiton. The applicant was arrested on 21/7/2017 and is now in custody as under trial prisoner for more than six years.
3. The allegation is that the applicant and his friends were drinking alcohol on the beach and as a result of some altercation that followed, it is alleged that the applicant assaulted the victim and stabbed him seven times. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that it is the applicant himself who went to the police station and handed over the weapon used for stabbing the victim. It is further submitted by learned Additional Public Prosecutor that there are eye witnesses to the incident. According to the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the number of injuries caused by the applicant are sufficient to deny the facility of bail to the applicant considering the gravity of the offence. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are ample materials against the applicant collected by the Investigating Officer during the investigation which form part of the chargesheet.
4. So far as the trial is concerned, though the same has commenced, only two witnesses have been examined. In all, 26 witnesses are to be examined by the prosecution. The applicant is in custody for more than six years. The trial is likely to take some time to conclude. There are no criminal antecedents reported against the applicant. On the ground of prolonged incarceration and as there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail by imposing conditions. The applicant is originally a resident of Nagpur who was working in a restaurant in Goa.
5. The application for bail is allowed. Accordingly, the following order is passed :
<WXY>ORDER
(i) The applicant is directed to be released on bail in respect of C.R. No. 137/2017 registered at the Calangute Police Station, upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000.00 with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.
(ii) The applicant shall attend the hearing of the case regularly on the dates fixed by the trial Court.
(iii) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence, induce, threaten or coerce the prosecution witnesses and shall not make any attempt to contact or intimidate them.
(iv) The applicant is from Nagpur. Considering the nature of the allegations, it would be in the fitness of things if the applicant does not enter the State of Goa till the conclusion of trial except for the purpose of reporting to the Investigating Officer and attending the trial till the trial is concluded.
(v) The applicant shall inform the trial Court as well as the Investigating officer his residential address and contact number while residing out of the State of Goa and which shall not be changed without prior permission of the Investigating Officer or the trial Court.
(vi) The applicant shall report to the Investigating Officer once every first Monday of the month between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon.
(vii) If there is a breach of conditions, it is open for the prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail.</WXY>
6. The Bail Application stands disposed of.
Prolonged pre-trial detention without prior criminal history can be a significant factor in granting bail, provided that conditions are imposed to safeguard the integrity of the trial.
The court may grant bail to an accused considering the length of time in custody and the progress of the case.
The presumption of innocence and the right to bail are fundamental principles in criminal law, which can only be overridden by compelling reasons, such as the risk of flight or tampering with evidenc....
The right to a speedy trial is a fundamental principle that can influence the granting of bail, particularly in cases of prolonged detention without trial.
The court established that prolonged detention without trial, alongside the nature of the injuries and the status of co-accused, can justify the granting of bail, reinforcing the presumption of innoc....
Court grants bail under BNSS, asserting no justification for continued detention.
The principle of parity in bail applications allows for similar treatment of accused individuals in comparable circumstances, provided that appropriate safeguards are in place to protect the integrit....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.