Back
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Sanjeev Kumar Bhakri – Appellant
Versus
Alembic Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
CM APPL. 23883/2023 & CM APPL. 23884/2023
1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. However, the certified copies of the exempted documents may be filed within four weeks from today.
3. Applications stand disposed of.
CM(M) 758/2023 & CM APPL. 23882/2023
4. The petitioners challenge the order dated 02.05.2023 in IA No. 03/2023 in RCT No.24/2023 titled `Sanjeev Kumar Bhakri Vs. Alembic Ltd.' whereby the learned RCT in an application seeking early hearing has varied the stay order passed by the learned RCT on 10.04.2023.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the garb of the early hearing application, the learned RCT could not have varied the stay order granted on 10.04.2023 without notice to the petitioner or hearing the petitioner on such variation.
6. Ms. Gurkamal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the learned RCT had passed the order for balancing the equities only and it is only on that ground that the learned RCT has permitted variation of the stay order and permitted the respondent to use the toilet which was on
Urgent decision by lower court without adjournment.
Urgent disposal of interim applications under relevant civil procedure rules.
Timely hearing of applications in civil proceedings is essential, with courts expected to adhere to deadlines and avoid unnecessary delays.
The urgency in the application due to illegal construction influenced the court's decision to direct the Trial Court to take up the application at the earliest and dispose of it expeditiously.
Urgency faced by senior citizens and the need to protect their possession of the suit property influenced the court's decision to maintain status quo until the First Appellate Court hears and decides....
The court may decline to interfere in a case, considering the pendency of numerous cases and the need for expeditious disposal.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and the rights conferred upon the parties under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Civil Procedure Code.
The court directed that departmental proceedings may continue during the pendency of a writ petition in the absence of a specific stay, while mandating the exchange of concise written submissions to ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
