IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Bhakri & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Alembic Limited & Anr. – Respondents
CM(M) 758 of 2023
Decided On : 09-05-2023
Exemption - Stay Order Variation - The court allowed exemption subject to exceptions and directed the filing of certified copies of exempted documents. The petitioners challenged the variation of a stay order without notice or hearing, and the court directed the matter to be decided urgently by the lower court without adjournment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners challenged the variation of a stay order without notice or hearing.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed the lower court to decide the issue urgently without adjournment.
Issues: Challenge to variation of stay order without notice or hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: Urgent decision by lower court without adjournment.
Final Decision: The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGMENT
Tushar Rao Gedela, J. (Oral)
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
CM APPL. 23883/2023 & CM APPL. 23884/2023
1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. However, the certified copies of the exempted documents may be filed within four weeks from today.
3. Applications stand disposed of.
CM(M) 758/2023 & CM APPL. 23882/2023
4. The petitioners challenge the order dated 02.05.2023 in IA No. 03/2023 in RCT No.24/2023 titled `Sanjeev Kumar Bhakri Vs. Alembic Ltd.' whereby the learned RCT in an application seeking early hearing has varied the stay order passed by the learned RCT on 10.04.2023.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in the garb of the early hearing application, the learned RCT could not have varied the stay order granted on 10.04.2023 without notice to the petitioner or hearing the petitioner on such variation.
6. Ms. Gurkamal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submits that the learned RCT had passed the order for balancing the equities only and it is only on that ground that the learned RCT has permitted variation of the stay order and permitted the respondent to use the toilet which was on the ground floor/loft/mezzanine floor till the next date of hearing. The First Appeal before the learned RCT is stated to be listed on 19.05.2023.
7. In view of the aforesaid controversy, though after observing from the photographs, there appears to be two different toilets, this Court refrains from passing any observations thereon.
8. Keeping in view the urgency and the vehemence with which both parties put across their submissions in respect of the toilet, this Court is of the considered opinion that the learned RCT takes up the matter on 11.05.2023 and decide the issue in respect of the toilet and the orders be passed thereon.
9. It is made clear that the learned RCT shall not adjourn the matter for any reason whatsoever.
10. Parties are directed to appear before the learned RCT positively without fail. In case any party fails to appear, learned RCT is directed to proceed with the hearing and pass the orders thereon.
11. The order dated 10.04.2023 is resurrected.
12. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
Urgent decision by lower court without adjournment.
Urgent disposal of interim applications under relevant civil procedure rules.
Timely hearing of applications in civil proceedings is essential, with courts expected to adhere to deadlines and avoid unnecessary delays.
The urgency in the application due to illegal construction influenced the court's decision to direct the Trial Court to take up the application at the earliest and dispose of it expeditiously.
Urgency faced by senior citizens and the need to protect their possession of the suit property influenced the court's decision to maintain status quo until the First Appellate Court hears and decides....
The court may decline to interfere in a case, considering the pendency of numerous cases and the need for expeditious disposal.
The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural timelines and the rights conferred upon the parties under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and the Civil Procedure Code.
The court directed that departmental proceedings may continue during the pendency of a writ petition in the absence of a specific stay, while mandating the exchange of concise written submissions to ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.