Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, GAURANG KANTH
Tarsem Singh – Appellant
Versus
DG CISF – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
CM APPL.24411/2023 & 24412/2023 (exemptions)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The applications are disposed of.
W.P.(C) 6207/2023 & CM APPL. 24410/2023
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under:
a. To direct the respondent, DG CISF, New Delhi, to retain the petitioner at any CISF units of North Sector only at his fourth service tenure in terms of the circular dated 25.9.2017;
b. To quash and set aside the orders, qua petitioner, dated 24.3.2023, and consequential order dated 14.4.2023 wherein petitioner has been transferred from the present Unit of IGI Airport New Delhi to Oil Duliajan, Assam.
c. To quash the letter dated 6.5.2023, qua the petitioner whereby the representation was disposed with remarks `regretted';
d. To direct the respondents to post the petitioner to a nearest sector unit, either at East Sector or, Central Sector, in terms of sub para 3 of para 12 of the Circular dated 25.9.2017.
4. Notice issued.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on advance notice, submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be decided again with a reasoned order.
6. Accordingly, order dated 06.05.2023 is hereby set a
The court emphasized the importance of a reasoned order and specified a timeframe for communicating the decision on the petitioner's representation.
The court emphasized the importance of passing a reasoned order on the petitioner's representation and providing specific relief to the petitioner.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order, in line with the petitioner's request for retenti....
The court emphasized the duty of authorities to decide pending representations in a timely manner, confirming jurisdiction to compel action under Article 226.
Timely decision on representations and communication of reasoned orders by the respondents.
Authorities must decide representations timely and fairly, adhering to principles of administrative justice.
The court emphasized the importance of communication from the respondents and provided the petitioner with the option to challenge the decision if aggrieved.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on the petitioner's representation and the stay of any movement order until the representation is decided.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondent deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order.
Timely decision-making and communication of reasoned orders in response to representations from CISF personnel seeking transfer.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
