Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Kulwant Raj – Appellant
Versus
Director General Central Industrial Security Force – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
CM APPL.22835/2023 (exemption)
1. The application is allowed, with a direction to the applicant to file requisite legible copies of documents and annexures within four weeks.
2. The application is accordingly disposed of.
W.P.(C) 5821/2023
3. The petitioner in his present petition has made following prayers:
a) To direct the respondents, DG CISF, New Delhi, to retain the petitioner at any CISF units of North Sector only at his fourth service tenure in terms of circular dated 25.09.2017.
b) To quash the orders, qua petitioner dated 24.03.2023, and consequential order dated 14.04.2023 wherein petitioner has been transferred from the present unit of IGI Airport New Delhi to ONGC DAHEJ, Gujarat or in the alternative.
c) To direct the respondents to defer the posting of the petitioner for at least a period of one year.
d) To direct the respondents to pay cost of this litigation to the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that qua the relief sought in the present petition, the petitioner made a presentation dated 30.03.2023. However, till date there is no communication from the other side.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents had assured this court t
The court emphasized the importance of communication from the respondents and provided the petitioner with the option to challenge the decision if aggrieved.
The court emphasized the importance of passing a reasoned order on the petitioner's representation and providing specific relief to the petitioner.
The court emphasized the importance of a reasoned order and specified a timeframe for communicating the decision on the petitioner's representation.
The court emphasized the duty of authorities to decide pending representations in a timely manner, confirming jurisdiction to compel action under Article 226.
Timely decision on representations and communication of reasoned orders by the respondents.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondents deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order, in line with the petitioner's request for retenti....
Authorities must decide representations timely and fairly, adhering to principles of administrative justice.
The court emphasized the importance of timely decision-making on the petitioner's representation and the stay of any movement order until the representation is decided.
The court emphasized the importance of the respondent deciding the petitioner's representation and communicating the decision with a reasoned order.
Transfer orders can be deferred by the court to uphold fairness when a valid claim is presented by the affected employee.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
