SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4431

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Tushar Rao Gedela, JJ.
Ravi Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 5991 of 2023 & CM Appls. 23500-501 of 2023
Decided On : 09-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. K.K. Sharma & Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC with Mr.Prajesh Vikram Srivastava (GP), for the Respondent.

Timely decision on representations and communication of reasoned order within a specified timeframe.

Headnote:

Recovery - Annual Increments - Direction to Decide Representations

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought direction to stop the recovery and refund two annual increments, and to grant the benefit of 1st MACP along with arrears of salary and consequential benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's representations within four weeks and communicate the decision with reasoned order within one week thereafter.

Issues: The issue was the delay in deciding the petitioner's representations regarding the recovery and benefits sought.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for timely decision on the petitioner's representations and directed the respondents to communicate their decision within a specified timeframe.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by giving directions to the respondents and allowed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum if aggrieved by the decision.

JUDGMENT (Oral)

CM APPL.23500/2023 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 5991/2023 & CM APPL. 23501/2023

3. Vide the present petition, petitioner prays as under: a. To direct the respondent nos.2 to 5 to stop the recovery and refund the recovery of two annual increments; b. To direct the respondent nos.2 to 5 to give benefit of 1st MACP to the petitioner and also the payment of two increments of year and arrears of salary along with all consequential benefits arising therefrom to the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that for the aforesaid relief(s), petitioner made representations dated 24.07.2021 and 16.04.2022 which has not been disputed by counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, however, till date, the said representations have not been decided by the respondents.

5. In view of above, we hereby dispose of the present petition by giving direction to the respondents to decide the abovementioned representations filed by the petitioner within four weeks from today and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within one week thereafter with reasoned order.

6. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of.

7. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representations, he may approach the appropriate forum.

8. Till the decision is taken, no further recovery shall be affected from the petitioner.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top