SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4671

MINI PUSHKARNA
Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Land And Building Department – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. N.S. Dalal, Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Mr. Alok Kumar and Ms. Rachana Dala, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M.S. Akhtar and Ms. Nidhi Thakur, Advocates, for R-1 & 2.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral)

1. Despite opportunity, no application has been filed for substitution of the Legal Representatives of the deceased petitioner.

2. It is seen from the record that the petitioner has not challenged the order dated 04.12.2019, by which the application of the petitioner for alternative allotment of land was rejected.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition challenging the order dated 04.12.2019 passed by the respondents, by which application for alternative allotment of land was rejected.

4. The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top