IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Chetraneka Shri (minor) – Appellant
Versus
Ayan Jorwal (Minor) & Ors. – Respondents
LPA 408 of 2023 & LPA 409 of 2023
Decided On : 18-05-2023
Admission Criteria - Sibling Category - Delhi School Education Act - Order No. F/DE/15/1031/ACT/2007/7002 - The court upheld the right of a student to receive points under the 'sibling category' for admission in a recognized private un-aided school, rejecting the school's contention that only students admitted under the 'open category' could avail the benefit of points under the 'sibling category'. The court emphasized that once a child is admitted in the school, his/her siblings are entitled to points under the 'sibling category' for securing admission in the Entry Level Classes. The judgment also highlighted the importance of clear, well-defined, equitable, and non-discriminatory admission criteria as outlined in the Delhi School Education Act and the relevant order.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a recognized private un-aided school in Delhi that issued admission guidelines, including a 'sibling category' for points allocation. The school rejected a student's application for admission under the 'open category' due to the absence of a tuition fee receipt for the sibling category. The student's father filed a writ petition contending that the student was entitled to points under the 'sibling category' regardless of the sibling's admission category.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the school's restriction of points under the 'sibling category' to students admitted in the 'open category' was not rational and transparent. It held that once a child is admitted in the school, his/her siblings are entitled to points under the 'sibling category' for securing admission in the Entry Level Classes.
Issues: The issues involved the entitlement of a student to points under the 'sibling category' for admission in a recognized private un-aided school and the validity of the school's restriction of points to students admitted in the 'open category'.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the admission guidelines, the Delhi School Education Act, and the relevant order, emphasizing the entitlement of siblings to points under the 'sibling category' once a child is admitted in the school.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal filed by the school and upheld the right of the student to receive points under the 'sibling category' for admission in the recognized private un-aided school. It also dismissed the appeal by another party, stating that there was no vested right for admission in the school.
JUDGMENT
CM APPLs. 22924-25/2023 (Exemption) in LPA 408/2023
CM APPL. 22929/2023 (Exemption) in LPA 409/2023
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
LPA 408/2023 & CM APPLs. 22922-23/2023
LPA 409/2023 & CM APPLs. 22927-28/2023
1. Both the LPAs have been filed challenging the Judgment dated 17.04.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 348/2023 whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition. With the consent of the Parties, both the LPAs are being taken up together for final disposal.
2. For the sake of convenience, the facts of LPA 409/2023 are being referred to which reads as under:
a) The Appellant/school is a recognised private un-aided school in Delhi. The Department of Education, GNCTD (DOE) issued a circular dated 21.11.2022 giving its schedule and guidelines for schools for admission in Entry Level Classes (below six years of age) for open seats other than EWS/DG/CWSN category seats in recognised private un-aided schools of Delhi for the academic year 2023-24.
b) The Appellant/school subsequently brought out a notification dated 28.11.2022 giving the schedule and the guidelines for admission in Entry Level Classes for the academic year 2023-24. The relevant portion of the said notification issued by the Appellant/school which is necessary for adjudication reads as under:
"Criteria for admission:
1. Neighborhood (40 Points)
List of localities with points is attached.
Required valid Documents (Proof of Residence- any one):
i) Ration Card/ Smart Card issued in the name of parents (Mother/Father having name of the child).
ii) Domicile certificate of child or of his/her parents.
iii) Voter I-Card (EPIC) of any of the parents.
iv) Electricity bill/ MTNL Telephone bill/ Water bill/ Passport in the name of any of the parents or child.
v) Aadhaar card/ UID card issued in the name of any of the parents.
2. Girl Child (10 Points): Select GIRL as gender. No documents required.
3. Sibling {30 Points}
The points will be awarded to the applicant only if his/her own brother/sister is studying in The Mother's International School."
c) The father of Respondent No.1 (writ petitioner) applied for admission of Respondent No.1 in Class-I of the Appellant/School for academic session 2023-2024, under the `Open Seat' Category. The Respondent No.1's father submitted the admission form online claiming total 70 points as per the criteria laid down by the School, i.e., 40 points under neighbourhood category and 30 points under sibling category, since the elder brother of the Respondent No.1 herein also studies in the Appellant/school.
d) On 20.12.2022, Respondent No.1's father received an email from the School, wherein it was stated that the application form of the Respondent No.1 has been rejected for the reason that latest tuition fee receipt in support of the `sibling criteria' had not been attached with the application form.
e) Pursuant to the receipt of the aforesaid email, father of the Respondent No.1 wrote emails dated 21.12.2022 & 22.12.2022 to the School stating that his elder son is a student of the School, who had been admitted under the Disadvantaged Group (DG) Quota and, therefore, he did not have the tuition fee receipt.
f) On 06.01.2023, the Appellant/School uploaded its list of all the applicants, along with points obtained by them wherein the Respondent No.1 was not granted the points under the 'sibling category'.
g) Thereafter, a letter dated 11.01.2023 was issued by the Appellant/School to the parent of Respondent No.1 stating that Respondent No.1 has got 40 points and his name will be included in the draw of lots for filling the seats in the 'open category'. It was informed that against the 13 open seats for general category, 288 children have registered their names for admission in Class-I and out of 13 seats, 11 children have got 50 or more points and as per the admission criteria, have been selected for admission (subject to verification of documents), 38 candidates have got 40 points, including the Respondent No.1 a
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of siblings to points under the 'sibling category' for admission in a recognized private un-aided school, emphasizing the importanc....
Admission criteria must be reasonable, rational, and non-discriminatory, and schools have the autonomy to devise criteria but must adhere to principles of fairness and equity.
Private unaided schools possess the autonomy to determine admission criteria, and the explicit refusal of sibling points based on the definition of 'sibling' adheres to constitutional standards of fa....
Private unaided schools have the autonomy to devise fair, reasonable, and transparent admission criteria, including the method of calculating distance, and the courts will uphold such criteria if fou....
The principle of constructive res judicata and the limited responsibility of private un-aided schools for admission from the neighborhood under the RTE Act, 2009.
The right to education under the RTE Act does not guarantee admission to a specific school, and residency criteria based on wards must be clarified by the State.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.