Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASMEET SINGH
Gauri Kansal (Minor) Through Father Anil Kansal – Appellant
Versus
Govt. Of Nct delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to admission criteria based on sibling points. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. petitioner's argument on arbitrariness of admission criteria. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondent's defence of admission criteria legality. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. judicial recognition of educational institutions' autonomy. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. criteria for awarding sibling points examined. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. clarification on legitimate expectations regarding admission criteria. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. court's dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 38 , 39) |
JUDGMENT :
JASMEET SINGH, J.
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to challenge the Admission Criteria of the respondent denying sibling points to the petitioner’s daughter.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. The petitioner is a citizen of India and his daughter is a candidate for admission in the respondent No. 3 school for academic session 2026-2027.
3. The respondent No. 3 is a private unaided school situated in New Delhi established and managed by Ashoka Education and Welfare society and registered at 13, School Site, Rohi
Private unaided schools possess the autonomy to determine admission criteria, and the explicit refusal of sibling points based on the definition of 'sibling' adheres to constitutional standards of fa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of siblings to points under the 'sibling category' for admission in a recognized private un-aided school, emphasizing the importanc....
The court found that minority institutions can be regulated by the State regarding admissions while retaining their autonomy, ensuring compliance with educational standards and merit without violatin....
The right of minority educational institutions to administer admissions under Article 30(1) is subject to reasonable regulations by the State to maintain educational standards.
The court established that the government has the authority to formulate scholarship policies and eligibility criteria, provided they are not arbitrary or in violation of statutory provisions, and th....
Uniform admission guidelines for educational institutions must be strictly adhered to; age eligibility cannot be relaxed arbitrarily as it leads to discrimination against other students.
The restriction imposed by the 2016 Rules on the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) is reasonable and thus saved by clause (6) of Article 19.
The fixation of government seat quotas in unaided minority institutions is unconstitutional and violates their fundamental right to autonomy under Article 30(1) of the Constitution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
