SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5070

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Nihal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Anr. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7427 of 2023 & CM APPL. 28875 of 2023
Decided On : 26-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Mr. A.K. Trivedi and Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shyam Sunder Rai Senior Panel Counsel along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna G.P. and Sh. Hemendra Singh DC, Law, BSF, for the Respondents.

The decision of independent subject experts is final and binding on the petitioner.

Headnote:

exemption - W.P.(C) 7488/2023 & CM APPL. 29070/2023 - The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and to have the correctness of the answers examined by subject experts, with the decision being final and binding on the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought to modify a result and have the correctness of answers examined by independent subject experts.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the respondents to treat the petition as a representation of the petitioner and to have the correctness of the answers examined by subject experts, with the decision being final and binding on the petitioner.

Issues: Modification of result, examination of correctness of answers, re-examination of petitioners' case for vacancies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for independent subject experts to examine the correctness of answers and directed the decision to be final and binding on the petitioner.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondents to treat it as a representation of the petitioner and to have the correctness of the answers examined by subject experts, with the decision being final and binding on the petitioner.

JUDGMENT (oral)

CM APPL. 29071/2023 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

W.P.(C) 7488/2023 & CM APPL. 29070/2023

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners pray as under:

a) To direct the respondents to modify the result dated 12.04.2023 and that of the petitioner as informed on 04.05.2023;

b) To direct the respondents to get the correctness of the answers to two questions examined from independent subject expert;

c) To direct the respondents to give the details of the last selected candidates in OBC category;

d) To direct the respondents to re-examine the case of the petitioners for the vacancies for post of HC(RM) if remains unfilled after any of the selected candidate does not join.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties in brief, we hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the present petition as a representation of the petitioner, and the same shall be decided by the Board of Officers consisting of Mathematics and Science experts within six weeks from today with a reasoned order.

5. The decision, so taken, shall be communicated to the petitioner within one week thereafter.

6. As agreed by the counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, the report of the Board of Officers shall be final and binding on the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the present petition along with pending applications is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top