SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 444

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Banita Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Another – Respondents
C.W.P. No. 1273 of 2023
Decided On : 01-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ajay Kumar Dhiman
For the Respondents: Rajan Kahol, Vishal Panwar, Ravi Chauhan, Anish Banshtu

Selected reserved category candidate qualifying written exam and producing valid category certificate at document verification cannot be denied appointment for expired certificate at application cut-off, as certificate affirms pre-existing status furthering reservation's equal opportunity objective.

Headnote:(A) Constitutional Law - Articles 14, 15, 16 and 39A - Reservation in public employment - Category certificate - Selected candidate applying under reserved category with expired certificate at cut-off date but qualifying written examination, called for document verification under reserved category, and producing valid certificate thereat cannot be denied appointment - Purpose of certificate is affirmation of pre-existing category belonging enabling benefit of reservation - Object of reservation is to achieve equal opportunity by remedying social, educational, economic backwardness - Strict compliance with uploading valid certificate at application not mandatory where candidature considered under reserved category throughout process - Prior precedents on mandatory uploading distinguished as inapplicable. (Paras 1, 6, 7, 8)

(B) Remedy in service matters - Error by authorities in evaluation leading to appointment of last candidate in merit - Direction to appoint rightful claimant without ousting innocent last appointee working for years - Supernumerary post if no vacancy - No actual monetary benefits for delay period but deemed date counts for seniority and service benefits. (Paras 9-14)

Facts of the case:
Advertisement for posts with reservation for category. Petitioner applied under reserved category uploading expired certificate valid upto before cut-off date 22.10.2022, qualified written examination held 09.10.2022, listed at serial no.64 for document verification on 21.01.2023, produced valid certificate dated 17.01.2023 but denied appointment insisting on validity at application cut-off.

Findings of Court:
Appointment offered to petitioner against post considering as 2023 appointee when others appointed, without withdrawing appointment of last selected in category; supernumerary post if needed.

Issues: Whether selected candidate under reserved category rendered ineligible for non-submission valid category certificate within advertisement cut-off date despite producing valid one at document verification after qualifying written exam.

Ratio Decidendi: Category certificate produced before provisional selection list entitles benefit of reservation as it affirms existing status, aligning with constitutional goal of equal opportunity; no rejection where considered under category till verification and valid certificate submitted then; balance equities by protecting innocent appointees while granting relief to eligible claimant.

Result: Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. obc candidate qualified despite invalid application certificate. (Para 1 , 2)
2. valid obc certificate mandatory by advertisement cut-off. (Para 3 , 4)
3. considered under obc if certificate valid at verification. (Para 5 , 6)
4. obc certificate submittable before provisional selection list. (Para 7 , 8)
5. balance petitioner rights without ousting last candidate. (Para 9 , 10)
6. protect innocent appointees from authority errors. (Para 11 , 12)
7. appoint petitioner supernumerary, protect existing seniority. (Para 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP SHARMA, J.

1. Precisely, the question, which needs to be determined in the case at hand, is that “whether a selected candidate belonging to OBC Category can be rendered ineligible on the ground of non-submission of OBC Certificate within cut-off date mentioned in the advertisement?”

2. Quintessential, the facts, as emerge from the pleadings, adduced on record by the respective parties are that vide Advertisement No.9/2022 dated 19.09.2022 (Annexure P-1), Atal Medical & Research University, Himachal Pradesh, advertised 723 posts of Community Health Officer, out of which 110 posts were reserved for OBC category. Petitioner herein, being fully eligible, applied for the post of Community Health Officer under OBC category and successfully qualified the written examination conducted on 09.10.2022, as is evident from office order dated 17.01.2023 (Annexure P-5), wherein name of the petitioner figures at serial No.64. After her having qualified the written examination, petitioner herself appeared for document verification on 21.01.2023, but despite her being fully eligible for the post reserved for OBC category, she was not offered appointment on the ground that she failed to submit valid OBC Certificate at the time of her making application for appointment against the post of Community Health Officer in terms of advertisement dated 19.09.2022 (Annexure P-1). In the afore background, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings, praying therein for the following main reliefs:-

“a. A writ in the nature of mandamus may be issued and thereby directing the respondent to consider the certificate of the petitioner dated 17.01.2023 annexure P-7 and given appointment to the petition as Community Health Officer in Health and Family Welfare department of State of H.P. under OBC Category as the petitioner was successful candidate in the written examination.”

3. Pursuant to notices issued in the instant proceedings, respondents No.1 & 2 have filed reply under the signatures of Mission Director, National Health Mission, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, perusal whereof clearly reveals that facts, as have been noticed hereinabove, have not been disputed, rather stand admitted. An attempt has been made to refute the claim of the petitioner on the ground that certificate adduced on record by the petitioner at the time of her making application was valid upto 29.06.2022 i.e. one year from the date of issue on 30.06.2021, as such, same could not have been taken into consideration, while considering the candidature of the petitioner against the post of Community Health Officer reserved for OBC category.

4. It has been averred in the reply that at the time of applying online for the post in response to the advertisement (Annexure P-1), petitioner was not in actual possession of a valid OBC Certificate, as such, could not claim any benefit of reservation under the said category. Though factum, if any, with regard to production of valid OBC Certificate at the time of documentation has not been denied by the respondents, but it has been claimed at their behest that relevant date for ascertaining the validity of OBC Certificate is/was the cut off date prescribed in advertisement i.e. 22.10.2022 by which time admittedly the OBC Certificate adduced on record by the petitioner along with application had lost its efficacy. In support of afore contentions, reliance has also been placed upon judgments passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top