SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5044

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J.
Tarun Kumar & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
The Principal Happy Hours School & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7953 of 2023 & CM Appls. 30622-30623 of 2023
Decided On : 31-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Devendra Kumar and Mr. N.K. Upadhyay, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, SC, GNCTD with Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocate, for DOE.
Mr. B.C. Pandey and Mr. S.P. Kamrah, Advocates, for R-1.
Ms. Manika Tripathy, Advocate, for R-5, SC/DDA.

In cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly due to the high demand for admission under this category.

Headnote:

Neighbourhood Criteria - Admission under EWS/DG Category - The court held that in cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, the schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly, as the demand for admission under this category is much higher than the available seats. The court emphasized the social purpose of reservation of seats under the EWS/DG category and directed the Directorate of Education to make endeavors to allot schools nearest to the residence of the students.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought directions to a school to grant admission to their wards under the EWS/DG category, despite the school's objection that the petitioners did not fulfill the neighbourhood criteria due to residing 4 kms away.

Finding of the Court:

The court rejected the school's objection and directed the school to grant admission to the petitioners' wards under the EWS/DG category, emphasizing the need to provide equal opportunities for education to children from weaker sections of society.

Issues: Admission under EWS/DG category, neighbourhood criteria, denial of admission despite being successful in the draw of lots.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, the schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly, considering the high demand for admission under this category.

Final Decision: The court directed the school to grant admission to the petitioners' wards in Class - 1 under the EWS/DG category and clarified that the petitioners shall make their own arrangements for travel to the school.

JUDGMENT

[Physical Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing]

Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral):

CM APPL. 30622/2023 (Application filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for exemption from filing the original/certified copies)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 7953/2023 & CM APPL. 30623/2023 (Application under Section 151 CPC for Ex-parte directions to the respondent No. 1/school to make provisional admission/to keep two seats vacant for the wards of the petitioners in Class-I herein under EWS/DG Category in the current Session 2023-2024)

3. The present writ petition has been filed with prayer for directions to the respondent No.1 school to grant admission to the petitioners under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category/Disadvantaged Group (DG) category in Class - 1. It is the case on behalf of the petitioners that despite being successful in the draw of lots conducted by the Directorate of Education (DOE) and having been allotted the school in question, they have been denied admission.

4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by ld. Counsels appearing of the respondents.

5. Mr. B.C. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 school submits that the residence of the petitioners is approximately 4 kms. away from the school in question. Therefore, he submits that the petitioners do not fulfil the neighbourhood criteria and cannot be granted admission on that account.

6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are willing to travel 4 kms. distance in order to study in the respondent school.

7. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the respondent school submits that the school does not provide any transportation to the areas where the petitioners reside.

8. Learned counsel appearing for the DOE submits that schools are allotted under the EWS/DG category as per the choice of the schools as given in the application form by the applicants. It is further submitted that the criteria of neighbourhood is not followed in the strict sense by the DOE at the time of allotment of schools under the EWS/DG category, in view of the fact that there are large number of applicants under the said category, while number of seats available under the said category are much low.

9. This Court has considered the submission made on behalf of the respondent school that the petitioners in question are residing at approximately 4 kms. distance from the school. This Court notes that only limited seats are available for admission under EWS/DG category in each of the school, whereas the number of applicants who desire to seek admission under the EWS/DG category are far more in number than the seats available. Therefore, while allotting seats for admission under the EWS/DG category, it may not be possible for the Directorate of Education (DOE) to follow the criteria of neighbourhood strictly. Therefore, it is held that in cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, the schools in question may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly.

10. This Court notes that in the present social milieu, the demand for admission under the EWS/DG category is much higher as compared to the number of seats that are available for allotment under the EWS/DG category. Therefore, if seats in a particular school are available under the EWS/DG category, then the DOE is required to allot such schools to the applicants who have applied for admission under the said category. If seats under the EWS/DG category are allowed to go waste, merely on the ground that the applicants who have been allotted such seats do not meet the neighbourhood criteria strictly, then the whole purpose of reservation of seats for admission under the said category will be defeated. The court cannot be oblivious of the noble purpose with which criteria has been developed for reservation of seats under the EWS/DG category. The social purpose of reservation of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top