IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J.
Amarjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Happy Hours School & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7158 of 2023 & CM APPL. 27905 of 2023
Decided On : 31-05-2023
EWS/DG Category - Admission Criteria - Neighbourhood Criteria
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought admission under the EWS/DG category in a school approximately 8 kms away. The school objected based on the distance of the petitioner's residence from the school.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that in cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly due to the high demand for admission under this category. The court emphasized the social purpose of reservation of seats under the EWS/DG category and directed the school to grant admission to the petitioner.
Issues: Admission under EWS/DG category, Neighbourhood criteria, Availability of seats
Ratio Decidendi: In cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly due to the high demand for admission under this category.
Final Decision: The respondent school was directed to grant admission to the petitioner in Class - 1 under the EWS/DG category, and the petitioner was instructed to make his own travel arrangements to the school.
JUDGMENT
[Physical Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing]
Mini Pushkarna, J. (Oral):
1. The present writ petition has been filed with prayer for directions to the respondent No.1 school to grant admission to the petitioner under Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Category/ Disadvantaged Group (DG) Category in Class - I.
2. The only objection which has been raised on behalf of the respondent school is that the residence of the petitioner is situated approximately 8 kms. away from the school in question.
3. On the last date of hearing, i.e., 24.05.2023, this Court had directed the Directorate of Education (DOE) to consider the said issue. Today learned counsel appearing for the DOE has submitted that it is not possible to allot any fresh school to the petitioner. He further submits that as regards the admissions under EWS/DG category, the criteria of neighbourhood is not followed in strict sense by the DOE, since in view of the fact that there are large number of applicants under EWS/DG category, while the seats under the said category are limited in number.
4. Learned counsel for the DOE further submits that the DOE considers the choice of school as given in the application for allotment of school under EWS/DG category. Further, the distance of the residence of the applicant from the school in question, is also taken into account at the time of allotment of school. He submits that since in the present case the respondent school in question was given as choice No. 2 in the application form, the said school was allotted by the DOE.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the residence of the petitioner may be approximately 8 Kms. away from the school, the petitioner is ready to travel the said distance from his residence to the school.
6. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent school at this stage submits that the respondent school does not provide any transportation to the area in question where the petitioner is residing.
7. This Court has considered the submission made on behalf of the respondent school that the petitioner is residing at approximately 8 kms. distance from the school. This Court notes that only limited seats are available for admission under EWS/DG category in each of the school, whereas the number of applicants who desire to seek admission under the EWS/DG category are far more in number than the seats available. Therefore, while allotting seats for admission under the EWS/DG category, it may not be possible for the Directorate of Education (DOE) to follow the criteria of neighbourhood strictly. Therefore, it is held that in cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, the schools in question may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly.
8. This Court notes that in the present social milieu, the demand for admission under the EWS/DG category is much higher as compared to the number of seats that are available for allotment under the EWS/DG category. Therefore, if seats in a particular school are available under the EWS/DG category, then the DOE is required to allot such schools to the applicants who have applied for admission under the said category. If seats under the EWS/DG category are allowed to go waste, merely on the ground that the applicants who have been allotted such seats do not meet the neighbourhood criteria strictly, then the whole purpose of reservation of seats for admission under the said category will be defeated. The court cannot be oblivious of the noble purpose with which criteria has been developed for reservation of seats under the EWS/DG category. The social purpose of reservation of seats under the EWS/DG category cannot be allowed to be lost, if such objections with regard to the applicants not meeting the neighbourhood criteria, are entertained especially when admissions under the EWS/DG category are involved.
9. This order is being passed keeping in view the fact that the children belonging to the weaker sections of the society are
In cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly due to the high demand for admission under this category.
In cases of admission under the EWS/DG category, schools may not insist upon following the neighbourhood criteria strictly due to the high demand for admission under this category.
The court emphasized the importance of providing education to economically disadvantaged children and upheld the provisions of RTE Act, 2009 in allowing the petition and directing the petitioner chil....
Private unaided schools are obligated to admit children from the economically weaker section and disadvantaged group to the extent of at least 25% of the class strength, as per the provisions of the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once a school has been allotted by the Department of Education, the school is bound to grant admission to the petitioner under the Disadvantag....
The Right to Education Act aims to ensure educational access for underprivileged children, and rigid adherence to distance criteria that denies admission contradicts this purpose.
Court's authority to direct admission in a newly allotted school under the EWS/DG category
Private unaided schools have the autonomy to devise fair, reasonable, and transparent admission criteria, including the method of calculating distance, and the courts will uphold such criteria if fou....
Economic standing not a criterion for admission under Disadvantaged Group category.
The main legal principle established is the obligation of the Directorate of Education to consider allotting schools for admission of children under the EWS/DG category in different classes based on ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.