SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 5023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Talwant Singh, JJ.
Vijay – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 7855 of 2023& CM APPL. 30288 of 2023 (for direction)
Decided On : 31-05-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Mansi Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhinav Sharma & Mr. Mahender Shukla, Advocates, for the Respondent-1 & 2/MCD.
Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP, for the State.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for street vendors to comply with the terms and conditions of the vending certificate and the relevant provisions of the Street Vendors Act.

Headnote:

Vending Certificate - Street Vendors - The court allowed the petitioner to vend within a specific zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the vending certificate, emphasizing compliance with Clause no. 11 and the law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to prevent interference in the running of his food stall from the vending site allotted to him. The terms and conditions of the vending certificate restricted the petitioner from vending at any particular location, and the relief sought was to vend strictly in accordance with the certificate.

Finding of the Court:

The court partly allowed the writ petition, directing the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to permit the petitioner to vend within a specific zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the vending certificate, without any hindrance.

Issues: Interference in running the food stall, compliance with vending certificate terms and conditions, and the relief sought by the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the terms and conditions of the vending certificate, particularly Clause no. 11, and the mandate of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014.

Final Decision: The writ petition was partly allowed, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi was directed to permit the petitioner to vend within a specific zone, subject to the terms and conditions of the vending certificate, without any hindrance.

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)--The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of the petitioner, praying as follows:

    "It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ may kindly be issued thereby directing the respondents not to interfere in the running of his business or cause any disturbance in the functioning of his food stall from the vending site allotted to him at 4933/1, Brijmohan Marg,Daryaganj Delhi-110002 by Town Vending Committee vide letter dated 22/09/2020 and as shown in site plan.

    Any other or further relief which this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be granted."

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1/MCD and Mr. Laksh Khanna, learned APP accepts notice on behalf of R-3/GNCTD.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the MCD, has invited our attention to the terms and conditions, permitting the petitioner to vend.

5. For the sake of completeness, the said terms and conditions attached to the Certificate of Vending, are reproduced herein below:

    "1. Vendor shall not have any other permanent or long-term vending certificate.

    2. Vending certificate is non-transferable.

    3. It is mandatory for the vendor to follow the vending period and zone as determined by TVC or local body.

    4. Vendor shall not give his vending certificate on rent in any way.

    5. Vendor shall not have any infectious disease.

    6. Vendor shall have to take care of hygiene on vending place/zone and nearby area and also take care of public health.

    7. Vendor shall display copy of vending certificate on his place/vending site and will produce original documents to TVC/concerned inspector whenever required.

    8. Vendor/Squatter shall insure that no hindrance be caused to pedestrian and vehicular moment.

    9. Vendor shall not vend/sell any harmful, dangerous and polluted items. It should also be ensured that the quality of the products sold and services provided to the public conform to the prescribed standards of public health, hygienic conditions and safety.

    10. The street vendor shall not do any unauthorized/illegal activity.

    11. Mobile vendors shall not stay or vend more than 30 minutes or time prescribed by the TVC at place in a vending/squatting zone.

    12. Vendors will not block footpaths and will not vend on roads. Vendor should take care of space in front of vending stalls/counters on footpath for pedestrians.

    13. Vending certificate can be cancelled or suspended on the basis of violations.

    14. Vendor shall not build or construct any kind of permanent or temporary structure at vending site.

    15. Seller shall adopt health and hygiene conditions as required by local laws and court orders.

    16. Vendor have to follow all the conditions mentioned in Delhi Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Scheme, 2019."

6. In terms of the Certificate of Vending issued to the petitioner, it is clearly stipulated that he cannot vend from any particular location, contrary to the express terms of Clause no. `11', of the said Certificate of Vending. It is further observed that since the Town Vending Committee (TVC) is yet to fix a time limit, providing for a period, during which a vendor can vend from any particular spot, the stipulation of 30 minutes time, contained in the said clause, is binding on the petitioner, at this stage. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states, that the petitioner does not pray for the relief of running his business from any particular vending site, within the zone where he has been permitted to vend by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, and further, the solitary relief that is prayed for, is to permit the petitioner to vend strictly, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Certificate of Vending dated 07.11.2021, issued by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi.

7. It is an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top