IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Amarjit Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 8071 of 2023, CM APPL. 31126 of 2023
Decided On : 01-06-2023
Exemption - Writ Petition - The court allowed the exemption subject to just exceptions and disposed of the application. The writ petition sought to quash a transferred order and seek permission to retain the present posting on compassionate grounds. The court found that the petitioner's representation had been rejected and directed the petitioner to make an appeal before the concerned authority, to be considered on compassionate grounds and disposed of within a specified period.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash a transferred order and seek permission to retain the present posting on compassionate grounds.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's representation had been rejected and directed the petitioner to make an appeal before the concerned authority, to be considered on compassionate grounds and disposed of within a specified period.
Issues: Quashing of transferred order, seeking permission to retain posting on compassionate grounds
Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner's representation had been rejected, and the court directed the petitioner to make an appeal before the concerned authority, to be considered on compassionate grounds and disposed of within a specified period.
Final Decision: The petition along with the pending applications stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGMENT (oral)
CM APPL. 31127/2023 (Seeking Exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
2. The application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 8071/2023
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:
"(a) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the transferred order dated 17.03.2023 qua the petitioner whereby the respondents have transferred the petitioner from Eastern Frontier, Lucknow to FA\V-I, Rupai, Assam,
(b) Issue a writ of mandamus to the respondents to follow the guidelines of Standing Order No. 02/2020 dated 15.10.2020 and allow the representation dated 22.05.2023 for seeking permission to retain at present posting on compassionate grounds.
(c) Pass such other and further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on advance Notice submits that on completion of three years of service at Lucknow, the petitioner made a representation stating therein that his son is studying in 09th standard and going to be promoted to 10th standard, therefore, one year extension may be granted to him, which was allowed. Thus, the petitioner has completed four years of service at one station.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he is not aware of the said fact.
6. It is not in dispute that the representation and appeal is to be made under the SOP. Since the representation of the petitioner has already been rejected by the respondents and as per paragraph 6(b) of the Standing Order No.03/2023 dated 10.02.2023 of Directorate General, ITB Police, MHA, Govt. of India, the petitioner is to make appeal before the concerned Authority.
7. Therefore, we hereby dispose of the present petition with liberty to the petitioner to make an appeal before the concerned Authority which shall be considered on compassionate grounds and be disposed of within a period given in the SOP.
8. The petition along with the pending applications stands disposed of accordingly.
The court directed the petitioner to make an appeal before the concerned authority, to be considered on compassionate grounds and disposed of within a specified period.
The court upheld the authority's discretion in transfer decisions, emphasizing the need for demonstrating arbitrariness for judicial intervention in military postings.
A government servant holding a transferable post has no vested right to remain posted at one place and is liable to be transferred from one place to another, and the court should not interfere with a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that unless arbitrariness is shown, the court should refrain from interfering in transfer and posting orders, especially in the case of armed force....
Timely decision-making by the respondents on the petitioner's representation and conditions for satisfaction of the petitioner's grievance are crucial in service transfer matters.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that transfer orders made in public interest and for administrative reasons, with proper justification and grounds provided by the authorities, sho....
The administrative prerogative power of transfer and the limited scope of court interference in transfer orders made in public interest and for administrative reasons.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that transfer orders must be in compliance with the relevant Standing Orders, and in cases of medical grounds, the authorities must consider the pe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering medical grounds for transfer and the need for fair monitoring of inter-zonal transfers as per the CRPF transfer polic....
The court has the power to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation regarding his transfer within a time-bound period and allow the petitioner to continue working at his pre....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.