SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Al-mabrook Hajj Group Social Tours And Travels – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
W.P.(C) 8408 of 2023
Decided On : 07-06-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Ms. Taiba Khan and Mr. Bhanu Malhotra, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr. Sunil, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The protection of religious freedoms under Article 25 of the Constitution of India and the need to ensure that pilgrims are not obstructed from completing their journey and undertaking Haj.

Headnote:

Haj Group Organizer - Registration Certificate & Quota - Circular No.15/28/20022-Haj-MoMA dated 14th March 2023 - The court discussed the conditions for registration of HGOs for Haj-2023, the misrepresentation of facts by the petitioner HGOs, and the impact on the pilgrims' rights. The court highlighted the constitutional protection of religious freedoms under Article 25 of the Constitution of India and emphasized the need to ensure that pilgrims are not obstructed from completing their journey and undertaking Haj.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Haj Group Organizer (HGO), challenged the suspension of their Registration Certificate and Quota for Haj-2023 and the Show Cause Notice issued against them. The petitioner argued that the suspension was arbitrary and violated fundamental rights. The respondent alleged wilful misrepresentation and misreporting of facts by the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court stayed the comments in the consolidated list of allocation of Haj Quota for HAJ-2023 and directed the respondents to ensure that affected pilgrims can undertake the Haj Pilgrimage without obstruction. The court allowed the investigation to proceed and disposed of the application.

Issues: Suspension of Registration Certificate and Quota, Allegations of Misrepresentation, Impact on Pilgrims' Rights, Constitutional Protection of Religious Freedoms

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to protect the rights of pilgrims and ensure their ability to undertake the Haj Pilgrimage without obstruction, considering the constitutional protection of religious freedoms.

Final Decision: The court stayed the comments in the consolidated list of allocation of Haj Quota for HAJ-2023, directed the respondents to ensure affected pilgrims can undertake the Haj Pilgrimage without obstruction, and allowed the investigation to proceed.

ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 32060/2023 (Exemption)

Subject to the petitioner filing the clear, original and legible/typed copies of any dim documents on which the petitioner may seek to place reliance, within four weeks from today, exemption is granted for the present.

The application is disposed of.

CM APPL. 32061/2023 (Stay)

1. The instant application has been filed challenging the suspension of the Registration Certificate and Quota of the Haj Group Organizer (HGOs) as published on 25th May, 2023 of the petitioner in the Consolidated List of Allocation of Haj quota for Haj-2023 and the Show Cause Notice subsequently issued against the petitioner/HGO on 26th May 2023 by the respondent.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's registration certificate and Haj quota have arbitrarily been ordered to be kept in abeyance till the finalization of proceedings in a complaint-related matter. It is submitted that this aforesaid course of action has taken place after the petitioner was found eligible/qualified as per the HGO Policy for Haj-2023 in the list dated 5th May, 2023 of eligible HGOs. Subsequently, the petitioner was issued a Registration Certificate and Quota Allocation on 18th May, 2023.

3. It is submitted that the respondent issued notice/circular inviting applications from eligible HGOs for registration and allocation of Quota for Haj-2023. The policy for registration and allocation of Quota for Haj-2023 was also attached with the said notice.

4. The petitioner submitted/uploaded the application for registration and allocation of Quota for Haj-2023 on the E-Haj portal of the respondent. The respondent declared the list of eligible and ineligible HGOs for Haj-2023 on its website on 5th May 2023. The petitioner was placed in the said list of eligible/qualified HGOs. The respondent, accordingly, sent the respective Registration Certificate to the petitioner and also allocated respective Haj Quota seats to the petitioners.

5. It is submitted that the respondent on 25th May 2023 issued the consolidated list of allocation of Haj Quota for Haj-2023 and published a comment against the name of the petitioners, which read as "Registration Certificate & Quota Kept in abeyance till finalization of proceedings in complaint related matter" Subsequently, vide email dated 26th May, 2023 the respondent sent a "Show Cause Notice" in relation to a complaint against the petitioner and asked the petitioner to reply to the same within 3 days on the ground of the alleged defaults committed by the petitioner.

6. It is contended that the petitioner have already sent the reply to the Show Cause Notice issued by the respondent objecting to the allegations made is completely false and bogus complaint and other issues to the satisfaction of the respondent.

7. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted that the action of the respondent of withholding of Registration Certificate and allocation of Haj quota post the scrutiny of the petitioner's application and declaration of petitioner as eligible HGO, when the petitioner has already taken booking from the Pilgrims and the pilgrims have paid in advance for the same, is completely arbitrary and in blatant violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner, as well as the rights of the pilgrims, as enshrined under Articles 14,19 & 21 of the Constitution of India.

8. It is submitted that the respondent, as a matter of principle of natural justice, should not stop the petitioner to undertake Haj Quota for Haj-2023 as the complaint is bogus and the petitioners have satisfied the HGO Policy. It is further submitted that even if any inquiry/investigation needs to be conducted the respondent can have a thorough investigation and then decide the fate of the petitioner. The HGO Policy has sufficient safeguards in the form of forfeiture of the security deposit and blacklisting of an HGO found in wrongdoings, and therefore, thor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top