DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, INDU MALHOTRA
Indian Young Lawyers Association – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
What is the status of the devotees of Lord Ayyappa — are they a religious denomination under Article 26? What is the correct approach to determine whether the exclusion of women (ages 10–50) from Sabarimala is an essential religious practice under Article 25(1) and 26? What is the constitutional relationship between Article 25 (individual religious freedom) and Article 26 (denominational rights) in the context of temple entry and the Kerala 1965 Act/Rules?
Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)
JUDGMENT :
Dipak Misra, CJI.
(for himself and A.M. Khanwilkar, J.)
Introduction
The irony that is nurtured by the society is to impose a rule, however unjustified, and proffer explanation or justification to substantiate the substratum of the said rule. Mankind, since time immemorial, has been searching for explanation or justification to substantiate a point of view that hurts humanity. The theoretical human values remain on paper. Historically, women have been treated with inequality and that is why, many have fought for their rights. Susan B. Anthony, known for her feminist activity, succinctly puts, “Men, their rights, and nothing more; women, their rights, and nothing less.” It is a clear message.
2. Neither the said message nor any kind of philosophy has opened up the large populace of this country to accept women as partners in their search for divinity and spirituality. In the theatre of life, it seems, man has put the autograph and there is no space for a woman even to put her signature. There is inequality on the path of approach to understand the divinity. The attribute of devotion to divinity cannot be subjected to the rigidity and stereotypes of gender. The dua
Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt
Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala
Raja Bira Kishore Deb v. State of Orissa
Shastri Yagnapurushadiji v. Muldas Bhundardas Vaishya
Durgah Committee, Ajmer v. Syed Hussain Ali
Sri Venkatramana Devaru v. State of Mysore
Deepak Sibal v. Punjab University
Shayara Bano v. Union of India
Anuj Garg v. Hotel Association of India
Charu Khurana v. Union of India
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
Commissioner of Police v. Acharya Jagadishwarananda Avadhuta
Seshammal v. State of Tamil Nadu
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Sri Radhakanta Deb v. Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowments, Orissa
Manoj Narula v. Union of India
Nallor Marthandam Vellalar v. Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment
Rev. Stainislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Nar Hari Shastri v. Shri Badrinath Temple Committee
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
John Vallamattom v. Union of India
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar
Durgah Committee, Ajmer v. Syed Hussain Ali
Acharya Jagadishwarananda Avadhuta v. Commissioner of Police, Calcutta
N. Adithayan v. Travancore Devaswom Board
Union of India v. S. Srinivasan
General Officer Commanding-in-Chief v. Dr. Subhash Chandra Yadav
Kunj Behari Lai Butail v. State of H.P.
Global Energy Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
State of T.N. v. P. Krishnamurthy
Nar Hari Sastri v. Shri Badrinath Temple Committee
Rev. Stainislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sri Adi Visheshwara of Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Varanasi v. State of U.P.
Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of Tamil Nadu
Riju Prasad Sarma v. State of Assam
Bharat Singh v. State of Haryana
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
S Mahendran v. The Secretary, Travancore Devaswom Board, Thiruvananthapuram
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. State of Bombay
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar
Sastri Yagnapurushadji v. Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya
Sri Adi Visheshwara of Kashi Vishwanath Temple, Varanasi v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam v. Government of Tamil Nadu
Bramchari Sidheswar Shai v. State of West Bengal
National Campaign for Dalit Human Rights v. Union of India
State of Karnataka v. Appa Balu Ingale
K S Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Ardeshir H Bhiwandiwala v. State of Bombay
CIT v. Taj Mahal Hotel, Secunderabad
Geeta Enterprises v. State of U P
Regional Director, ESIC v. High Land Coffee Works of P.F.X. Saldanha & Sons
Union of India v. Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Co Ltd
Additional District Magistrate v Siri Ram
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Education v Paritosh Bhupeshkumar Sheth
The State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali
Yogendra Nath Naskar v. Commissioner of the Income-Tax, Calcutta
Shri A.S. Narayana Deekshitulu v. State Of Andhra Pradesh
Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v. State of Bombay
Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India
Ewanlangki-E-Rymbai v. Jaintia Hills District Council
Bhimashya v. Janabi (Smt) Alia Janawwa
Salekh Chand (Dead) by LRs v. Satya Gupta
Tilkayat Shri Govindlalji Maharaj v. State of Rajasthan
Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. State of T.N. & Ors.
Hans Muller of Nurenburg v. Superintendent, Presidency Jail, Calcutta
Mahant Moti Das v. S.P. Sahi, The Special Officer In Charge of Hindu Religious trust
Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala
Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. The State of Bombay
Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Subramaniam Swamy v. Union of India, Ministry of Law
Maharajshri Narendra Prasadji Anandprasadji Maharaj v. The State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.