IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Harjaspreet Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 7082 of 2022
Decided On : 06-04-2023
498A/406/34 IPC - Matrimonial Dispute - Hindu Marriage Act 1955, Indian Divorce Act, Special Marriage Act 1954 - The court discussed the settlement deed between the parties, which included dissolution of marriage, payment of settlement amount, quashing of FIR, and withdrawal of cases. The court also referred to previous judgments emphasizing the encouragement of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes.
Fact of the Case:
The parties got married but due to temperamental differences, they started living separately. The wife lodged an FIR, but the parties later settled the matter amicably through a settlement deed, including dissolution of marriage and payment of settlement amount. The husband filed a petition for quashing the FIR.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had voluntarily settled the matrimonial dispute without fear, force, or coercion. It considered the settlement deed and previous judgments emphasizing the encouragement of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes.
Issues: Matrimonial dispute, settlement deed, quashing of FIR, amicable settlement
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and considered the voluntary nature of the settlement between the parties.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and disposed of the petition.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. This is a petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 52/2019 under sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Kishan Garh.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the parties got married on 15.09.2018 according to Sikh Rites and ceremonies. There is no child born out of this wedlock. That due to temperamental differences between them the parties are living separately since 22.10.2018.
3. It is submitted that owing to the differences between the parties, the Respondent No.2 lodged the above-mentioned FIR. It is further submitted that now the parties have settled the matter amicably among themselves vide settlement deed dated 26.08.2022.
4. The terms of the Settlement Deed are as follows -
"1. Parties here by mutually agreed to dissolve their marriage by filing a joint petition for divorce by way of mutual consent U/s 13 (B) (1) of Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 or Indian Divorce Act U/s 10A (1)/special marriage Act 1954 U/s 28 (1) in the court of competent jurisdiction at New Delhi on or before 15/09/2022.
2. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent (Husband) shall pay lump sum consideration of Rs-5000000/- (Fifty Lakhs only) to the petitioner (Wife) as full and final settlement (against the petitioners past present and future maintenance, permanent alimony, stridhan etc) under the following manner in three installments.
3. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent (Husband) will pay a sum of Rs.1600000/- (sixteen Lakhs) in the form of DD to the petitioner (Wife) at the time of recording of statements of both the parties before the Hon'ble family court under the first motion proceedings. First motion petition shall be prepared by the Respondent.
4. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent (Husband) will pay a sum of Rs.1600000/- (sixteen Lakhs) to the petitioner (Wife) at the time of recording of statements of both the parties before the Hon'ble family court on under the second motion proceedings as second installment in the form of DD. Second motion petition shall be file by the both the parties within 30 days of expiry of mandatory cooling period of six month after completion of first motion or both the parties shall file an application for waiving of mandatory cooling period of six month after first motion. Second motion petition shall be prepared by the Respondent.
5. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent (Husband) will pay a some of Rs 1800000/- (Eighteen Lakhs) in the form of DD to the petitioner Wife) at the time of quashing of FIR No-52/2019 U/s 498A/406/34 IPC PS Kishangarh in Hon'ble Delhi High court within 30 days after second motion and the petitioner (Wife) shall cooperate and sign all the necessary affidavit and appear for statements and do the needful in quashing of said FIR. The FIR quashing shall be filed by the Respondent (Husband).
6. It is agreed between the parties that petitioner shall file quashing of FIR No- 2087/2019 U/s 67 of IT Act at Karnataka High court after second motion of mutual divorce and respondent shall cooperate and sign all the necessary affidavit and appear for statements and do the needful in quashing of said FIR.
7. It is agreed between the parties that in event of non- appearance for the purpose of withdrawal of cases or quashing of FIR in Delhi High Court or any other High Court in India the petitioner (Wife) shall return the received amount with 2 percent interest per month to the respondent (Husband). Similarly if the respondent (Husband) does not appear for the purpose quashing of FIR the said amount shall stand forfeited by petitioner (Wife) and shall not be adjusted any arrear or any other.
8. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all or any prior agreement/correspondences/negotiations/discussions/representations, both written as well as oral, among the parties.
9. Parties also agree that the petitioner (Wife), shall not claim, in
The court emphasized the duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and considered the voluntary nature of the settlement between the parties.
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of matrimonial differences where parties have reached an amicable settlement.
Courts can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of matrimonial differences where the parties have reached an amicable settlem....
Courts have a duty to encourage amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes, and if parties have voluntarily settled the matter without coercion, the court may quash related proceedings.
The voluntary and amicable nature of a settlement in cases arising from matrimonial differences can be a basis for quashing non-compoundable offences under relevant legal provisions.
Courts may exercise inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial disputes if the parties have reached an amicable settlement, as established in previous judgments.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, especially in cases arising out of matrimonial dif....
The court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The central legal point established is the court's authority to exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash FIRs and proceedings based on amicable settlements in matrimonial dispu....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.