IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Sh. Vanshaj Sharma & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 5597 of 2022
Decided On : 28-08-2023
Section 482 Cr.P.C. - Quashing of FIR - Settlement under Hindu Marriage Act - 13(B) - 498A/406/34 IPC
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash FIR No. 163/2018 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC. The parties had entered into a settlement agreement and obtained a mutual divorce decree.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parties had amicably settled their disputes and obtained a mutual divorce decree. Considering the settlement and dissolution of marriage, the court quashed the FIR and all proceedings emanating from it.
Issues: The main issue was whether the FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC should be quashed in light of the amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code can be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the court process. It relied on previous judgments to emphasize that matrimonial disputes should be put to rest if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
Final Decision: The court quashed FIR No. 163/2018 and all proceedings emanating from it, considering the amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No. 163/2018 registered at P.S. Nihal Vihar under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, and the proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 04.12.2013 in accordance with the Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR. He submits that the chargesheet, in this case, has already been filed and the matter is pending before the Learned MM, (Mahila Court), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably, and in furtherance thereof, they have entered into a settlement vide Settlement deed dated 27.01.2022 before Counseling Cell, Family Court Tis Hazari, Delhi. As per the settlement it has been agreed between the parties that the petitioner shall pay Rs.2,00,000/- (Two Lakh Rupees) in full and final settlement of the entire dispute to respondent no. 2/complainant.
4. Pursuant to the settlement, a mutual divorce petition was also filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 04.08.2022 passed by Learned Principal Judge, Family Courts, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
5. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash FIR No. 163/2018 registered at P.S. Nihal Vihar under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. I have gone through the settlement which has been placed on record. The settlement agreement provides for the following terms and conditions:
"1. That the petitioner and respondent have agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent in accordance with law provides U/s 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
2. It is agreed between the parties that husband shall pay to the wife a sum of Rs.Two Lacs Only & Articles (list enclosed) as full and final settlement (against istridhan and dowry, maintenance towards past, present and future qua this marriage in three installments by way of DD/Pay Order. There is no issue from this wedlock.
3. It is further agreed between the parties that the husband will pay Rs.Seventy Five Thousand only & articles (list enclosed) to the wife at the time of recording of the statement of first motion by the way of DD/Pay Order. (RS.75,000/- only).
4. It is further agreed between the parties that the husband will pay Rs.Fifty Thousand only to the wife at the time of recording of the statement of second motion by way of DD/Pay Order (Rs.50,000/- only).
5. It is agreed between the parties that the first motion petition shall be filed on or before 10th Feb 22 and second motion petition shall be filed soon after the completion of the period of the statutory period of the order U/s 13-B(1) of HMA or as early as possible.
6. It is further agreed between the parties that the respondent shall pay Rs.Seventy Five Thousand only to the petitioner at the time of recording of statement in quashing of FIR No.0163/18 under section 498(A), 406 & 34 P.S. Nihal Vihar in Hon'ble High Court of Delhi within two months after second motion and petitioner shall cooperate and sign all the necessary affidavit and do the needful in quashing of the said FIR.
7. There is/are ________child/children namely________from this wedlock who is/are living with the _______. It is agreed between the parties that custody will be with ______. The will/will not have visitation right.(No)
8. It is further agreed between the parties that the petitioner/respondent will withdraw the case which is pending in the court of Ms. Renu Bhatnagar,
The court can exercise inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code to quash FIRs in matrimonial disputes if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties, using inherent powers under section 482 of the Cod....
The court can exercise inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of matrimonial differences where parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The court can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of matrimonial disputes where the parties have reached an amicable settlem....
Courts can exercise inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in cases of matrimonial differences where the parties have reached an amicable settlem....
The court emphasized the use of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of any court, particularly in cases of amicable settlement....
The court can exercise its inherent powers to quash non-compoundable offences, especially in matrimonial disputes, if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the court's power to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The court can quash non-compoundable offences arising from matrimonial differences if the parties have reached an amicable settlement.
The court emphasized the importance of amicable settlements in matrimonial disputes and the exercise of inherent powers under section 482 of the Code to secure the ends of justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.