SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1736

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 7070 of 2022 and Cr.M.A. 27312 of 2022
Decided On : 10-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Mr. Vinayk Chawla, Advocates (DHCLSC), for the Petitioner.
Mr. Hemant Mahela, APP, for State with Mr. Dipanshu Meena, Advocate and SI Bajrang, PS Patel Nagar.
Ms. Sheenu Priya and Mr. Muhammad Zaid, Advocates, for the Respondent.

The court may quash criminal proceedings when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue, considering special facts of the case.

Headnote:

Quashing of FIR - Mental Ailments - Settlement and Compromise Deed

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner entered the office of Aam Aadmi party, took away the hand watch of the complainant, damaged the office property, and locked the main gate. The respondent alleged these actions and an FIR was registered. However, a settlement deed was entered into between the parties, and the respondent expressed no objection to quashing the FIR.

Finding of the Court:

Considering the settlement deed and the respondent's affidavit, along with the petitioner's mental ailments and permanent disability, the court quashed the FIR and all related proceedings.

Issues: Quashing of FIR under sections 380/427/442 IPC, Settlement and Compromise Deed, Petitioner's Mental Ailments and Disability

Ratio Decidendi: The court may quash criminal proceedings when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue. The settlement deed and the petitioner's mental ailments and disability were considered as special facts of the case.

Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No. 798/2015 and all related proceedings.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)

CRL.M.A. 27313/2022

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 7070/2022

1. Present petition has been filed under section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 798/2015 registered under sections 380/427/442 IPC at PS Patel Nagar.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR was registered on the statement on Respondent No.2 alleging therein that the petitioner entered into the office of Aam Aadmi party breaking and damaging the wall of the office and took away the hand watch of the complainant. He also locked the main gate of the office from inside and ran away after breaking the glass of the office windows.

3. It is submitted that pursuant to the discussion between the parties and with intervention of respectable members of the society and their well- wishers the dispute was settled and parties entered into a compromise vide settlement deed dated 20.12.2022 out of their own free will without any fear, force or coercion.

4. An Affidavit of Respondent No.2 is on record stating that he has settled the dispute with the petitioner out of his own free will, and has no objection if the FIR No.798/2015 dated 25.09.2015 registered at PS Patel Nagar under sections 380,427 and 442 of IPC as well as Criminal Case No.63864/2016 titled as "State v. Amarjeet Singh" and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

5. The terms of the settlement deed dated 20.12.2022 is as follows:

    "AND WHEREAS The FIRST PARTY with his free will and accord has decided to drop, withdraw and settle all the legal proceedings resulting from the registration of the said FIR.

    AND WHEREAS it is further stated that both the parties with their fair consent have settled the matter with each other amicably and voluntarily without any force, pressure, coercion or influence from any corner whatsoever.

    AND WHEREAS the SECOND PARTY will file the quashing petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi seeking quashing of the FIR No.798/2015 dated 25.09.2015, u/s 380/427/442 IPC, registered with P.S. Patel Nagar, as well as the Criminal Case No.63864/2016 titled as "State v. Amarjeet Singh" pending before the Ld.ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. The FIRST PARTY has agreed to co-operate in filing of the quashing petition.

    AND WHEREAS This Settlement/Compromise Deed has been signed without any force pressure, threats, coercion and with their free consents, in full sense and in disposing state of minds in the present case."

6. It is submitted that the petitioner is suffering from various mental ailments i.e., depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic attacks, seizures, and has been on medication since 2016. The petitioner is also stated to be suffering from 50% permanent locomotor disability owing to an accident suffered by him in 2017. I have perused the true copies of medical prescriptions as well as the true copy of Unique disability card issued by the Government of India which are placed on record.

7. It has been repeatedly held that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, the court may while taking into consideration the special facts of a case quash the proceedings.

8. In view of the above circumstances the case FIR No. 798/2015 registered under sections 380/427/442 IPC at PS Patel Nagar, and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Present petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top