IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 7070 of 2022 and Cr.M.A. 27312 of 2022
Decided On : 10-04-2023
Quashing of FIR - Mental Ailments - Settlement and Compromise Deed
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner entered the office of Aam Aadmi party, took away the hand watch of the complainant, damaged the office property, and locked the main gate. The respondent alleged these actions and an FIR was registered. However, a settlement deed was entered into between the parties, and the respondent expressed no objection to quashing the FIR.
Finding of the Court:
Considering the settlement deed and the respondent's affidavit, along with the petitioner's mental ailments and permanent disability, the court quashed the FIR and all related proceedings.
Issues: Quashing of FIR under sections 380/427/442 IPC, Settlement and Compromise Deed, Petitioner's Mental Ailments and Disability
Ratio Decidendi: The court may quash criminal proceedings when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue. The settlement deed and the petitioner's mental ailments and disability were considered as special facts of the case.
Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR No. 798/2015 and all related proceedings.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 27313/2022
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 7070/2022
1. Present petition has been filed under section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 798/2015 registered under sections 380/427/442 IPC at PS Patel Nagar.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present FIR was registered on the statement on Respondent No.2 alleging therein that the petitioner entered into the office of Aam Aadmi party breaking and damaging the wall of the office and took away the hand watch of the complainant. He also locked the main gate of the office from inside and ran away after breaking the glass of the office windows.
3. It is submitted that pursuant to the discussion between the parties and with intervention of respectable members of the society and their well- wishers the dispute was settled and parties entered into a compromise vide settlement deed dated 20.12.2022 out of their own free will without any fear, force or coercion.
4. An Affidavit of Respondent No.2 is on record stating that he has settled the dispute with the petitioner out of his own free will, and has no objection if the FIR No.798/2015 dated 25.09.2015 registered at PS Patel Nagar under sections 380,427 and 442 of IPC as well as Criminal Case No.63864/2016 titled as "State v. Amarjeet Singh" and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
5. The terms of the settlement deed dated 20.12.2022 is as follows:
"AND WHEREAS The FIRST PARTY with his free will and accord has decided to drop, withdraw and settle all the legal proceedings resulting from the registration of the said FIR.
AND WHEREAS it is further stated that both the parties with their fair consent have settled the matter with each other amicably and voluntarily without any force, pressure, coercion or influence from any corner whatsoever.
AND WHEREAS the SECOND PARTY will file the quashing petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi seeking quashing of the FIR No.798/2015 dated 25.09.2015, u/s 380/427/442 IPC, registered with P.S. Patel Nagar, as well as the Criminal Case No.63864/2016 titled as "State v. Amarjeet Singh" pending before the Ld.ACMM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and all consequent proceedings emanating therefrom. The FIRST PARTY has agreed to co-operate in filing of the quashing petition.
AND WHEREAS This Settlement/Compromise Deed has been signed without any force pressure, threats, coercion and with their free consents, in full sense and in disposing state of minds in the present case."
6. It is submitted that the petitioner is suffering from various mental ailments i.e., depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic attacks, seizures, and has been on medication since 2016. The petitioner is also stated to be suffering from 50% permanent locomotor disability owing to an accident suffered by him in 2017. I have perused the true copies of medical prescriptions as well as the true copy of Unique disability card issued by the Government of India which are placed on record.
7. It has been repeatedly held that when the chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and, therefore, no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a criminal prosecution to continue, the court may while taking into consideration the special facts of a case quash the proceedings.
8. In view of the above circumstances the case FIR No. 798/2015 registered under sections 380/427/442 IPC at PS Patel Nagar, and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Present petition is disposed of.
The court may quash criminal proceedings when the chances of conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing the prosecution to continue, considering special facts of th....
The court has the power under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings when a settlement between parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing a crim....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings if the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the case would be an abuse ....
The court has the discretion to quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement and the interest of social harmony.
The court may exercise power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings when the chances of conviction are bleak and a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations.
Courts may quash FIR and criminal proceedings based on settlement reached between the parties, considering the free will of the parties and the totality of facts and circumstances.
The court may exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings when a settlement between the parties would lead to better relations and no useful purpose would be served by ....
The power to quash criminal proceedings based on a settlement between the parties depends on the facts and circumstances of each case, and the court must consider the nature and gravity of the crime,....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.