Back
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, GAURANG KANTH
Ajay Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Mridula Mukherjee – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Siddharth Mridul, J. (Open Court)
1. Mr. Ajay Mahajan, the appellant herein, has filed a joint application under the provisions of Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, along with his siblings namely Ms. Mridula Mukherjee (respondent no. 1 herein and original plaintiff, in the subject suit) and Ms. Sucheta Mahajan (respondent no. 2 herein and original defendant no. 2, in the subject suit); stating therein that they have entered into an amicable settlement, the terms of which have been formalized into a compromise deed dated 29.03.2023 (a copy of the same is annexed to the present application as Annexure A).
2. In view of the foregoing, it is stated on behalf of the parties that a decree, in terms of the aforesaid compromise deed dated 29.03.2023, be passed.
3. It is further, the admitted position between the parties that all outstanding disputes, forming the subject matter of the suit, being CS(OS) No. 585/2018, titled as `Mridula Mukherjee Vs. Ajay Mahajan and Anr.' stand concluded in terms of the aforesaid compromise deed dated 29.03.2023.
4. The present application is duly supported by affidavits, on behalf of Mr. Ajay Mahajan
The court has the authority to pass a decree in terms of a compromise deed under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and can order the refund of court fees in accordance wit....
The court has the discretion to permit parties to settle their disputes in the interest of justice, and a compromise/settlement agreement can be allowed if found to be legal.
The court upheld the legality of a settlement agreement between parties in a civil dispute, allowing the appeal to be resolved without further litigation.
A binding compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure prevents parties from raising further claims related to the settled issues.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the value of family arrangements in resolving disputes and bringing harmony in the family, and the finality of settlements made with the consent of....
A compromise deed can resolve disputes over joint ownership, and courts will enforce valid agreements between parties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the enforceability of an oral Family Settlement, reduced in writing, under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the validity and binding nature of the compromise deed in settling disputes and passing the decree of partition.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
