SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ram Kumar Shokeen – Appellant
Versus
Rajpal Shokeen – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

I.A.15848/2021

1. Joint application has been filed on behalf of plaintiff and defendant nos.1 & 2 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for passing the decree of partition in view of the compromise deed dated 17.11.2021 along with site plans annexed thereto.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and prays that the decree in terms mentioned in compromise deed dated 17.11.2021 with site plans be issued.

3. In view of the submission of counsel for the plaintiff, application is allowed and disposed of.

4. Accordingly, compromise deed dated 17.11.2021 along with site plans be taken on record.

CS(OS) 213/2019

5. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking partition of immoveable property under the Partition Act, 1893 and permanent injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6. The plaintiff and defendants are real brothers and are joint owners of the following suit properties:

i. The constructed property upon the land admeasuring 927 sq. yds in Khasra No.251-252, Mohalla Pachaya, Near MCD School, Village Chhawla, New Delhi-110071.

ii. The double st

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top