Back
SANJEEV NARULA
Dharampal Satyapal Sons Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Google L. L. C. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)
CS(COMM) 322/2020 and I.A. No. 6533/2023 (under Order XIII-A Rules 3 and 6(1)(a) r/w Order VIII Rule 10 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908)
1. The present lawsuit seeks permanent injunction restraining defamation, disparagement of Plaintiff's products manufactured and sold under their registered trademark "CATCH"/"[IMG]" [hereinafter, "CATCH mark"] and also infringement of copyright vested in packaging of said products.
PLAINTIFF'S CASE
2. The Plaintiff is a part of the Dharampal Satyapal Group, a conglomerate established in 1929, having a strong presence in food and beverages, hospitality, mouth fresheners, pan masala, tobacco, agro-forestry, dairy, rubber thread and infrastructure sectors. Plaintiff's trademark "CATCH" has been continuously and extensively in use since 1987 for food and beverages, including spices, seasoning, bottled natural spring water, tonic water and soda.
3. Plaintiff's products under the CATCH mark are used by large number of customers. Their spices have exquisite flavours and aromas and use the Low Temperature Grinding technology, which prevents evaporation of volatile and delicate oils from the spices.
The deliberate attempt to defame and disparage Plaintiff's goods, trademark infringement, and copyright infringement were key legal principles established in the judgment.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the trial court must follow the mandate provided under Order VII Rule 10A(1) of the CPC when returning a plaint, and there must be a cause of ....
The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case of copyright infringement, while defendants claimed fair use and truth defenses for defamation, necessitating a trial to assess merits.
Defamation claims must be substantiated with evidence; interim injunctions can be granted to restrain publication of statements deemed severely defamatory.
The main legal point established is that while the defense of justification requires evidence and should be determined at trial, the use of strong and offensive words in a defamatory context can impa....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
