SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA MENON
Fiitjee Limited – Appellant
Versus
Vidya Mandir Classes Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of the parties and dispute (Para 3 , 4)
2. plaintiff's arguments against the defendants (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. nature of competition and defamation (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. assessment of justification defenses (Para 16 , 19 , 25 , 26)
5. defamatory statements and their implications (Para 29 , 30)
6. court's final orders on the case (Para 32 , 33 , 35 , 36)

ORDER

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

LA. 16137/2021 (of plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC for interim relief)

1. This order will dispose of I.A No.16173/2021 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ('CPC' in short) filed by the plaintiff for interim relief.

2. I have heard the submissions of Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, learned senior counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, learned senior counsel for the defendant No.1, Mr. Rajiv Nayar, learned senior counsel for the defendant No.2 and Mr. Aditya Gupta, learned counsel for the defendant No.9 and considered the material on record and the cited case laws.

3. The plaintiff describes itself as a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, constituted in the year 1992 for the purpose of imparting quality education to student

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top