Back
2023 Supreme(Del) 5029
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tushar Rao Gedela, J.
Mr. Ajay Jain & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Madhu Jain – Respondent
CM(M) 655 of 2023
Decided On : 08-05-2023
Mr. Mridul Jain, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondent.
Correction of errors in recording names of counsel in judgments.
Headnote:
Corrigendum - Legal Proceedings - The court issued a corrigendum to correct the names of the counsel recorded in a previous judgment.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner's counsel wished to withdraw the application and file the same in the trial court. The counsel pointed out incorrect recording of names in a previous judgment.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the application as withdrawn and directed necessary corrections to be carried out for the names of the counsel in the previous judgment.
Issues: Incorrect recording of names of counsel in a previous judgment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the names of the counsel had been incorrectly recorded in a previous judgment and directed for necessary corrections to be made.
Final Decision: The application was dismissed as withdrawn, and the court directed for a corrigendum to be issued to correct the names of the counsel in the previous judgment.
ORDER
[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]
CM APPL. 23137/2023 in CM(M) 655/2023
1. After some arguments, Mr. Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present application and file the same in the learned Trial court.
2. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Mr. Jain, learned counsel points out to the judgment dated 25.04.2023 passed by this Court and submits the names of the counsel who had appeared for the petitioner as well as for the respondent have been recorded wrongly.
4. A perusal of para 4 and para 7 of the said judgment, it is clear that the names have been incorrectly recorded. For the purpose of record, the name of the counsel for the petitioner be recorded as Mridul Jain for the petitioner and Dr. Amar Nath Gupta for the respondent.
5. In view of the above, necessary corrections be carried out and a corrigendum be issued with regard thereto and copy of the order may be uploaded on the website.
