IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Iqbal Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Jamia Millia Islamia University & Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) 1213 of 2017
Decided On : 24-04-2023
Pay Scale Discrimination - Storekeeper - CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 - ARTICLES 14, 16 and 39(d) of the Constitution of India - 4th CPC, 5th CPC, 6th CPC - Rs. 9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200 - The court found that the pre-revised pay scale of the Storekeepers in the University was Rs.1640-2900, and several other Storekeepers in different departments were given the revised pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200. The court remanded the matter back to the University for re-consideration of the pay-scale of the Petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner, a Storekeeper at a university, sought a higher pay scale, claiming discrimination compared to other Storekeepers in different departments who were given a higher pay band.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Petitioner's claim of discrimination was supported by documents showing the pre-revised pay scale of Storekeepers and the higher pay scale granted to other Storekeepers in different departments.
Issues: Discrimination in pay scale for Storekeepers, interpretation of pre-revised pay scale, and justification for higher pay scale granted to other employees.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the matter should be remanded back to the University for re-consideration of the Petitioner's pay scale, taking into account the documents presented by the Petitioner.
Final Decision: The court ordered the University to treat the petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks, considering the documents presented by the Petitioner.
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)
1. Present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:
"a) Pass an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of declaration, declaring that non-grant of pay scale of Rs. 9300- 34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4200, as was being given to other Store-keepers {including juniors), doing the same type of work, by the Respondent No.1 University as arbitrary and discriminatory and that the same infringed the fundamental rights of the Petitioner guaranteed under ARTICLES 14, 16 and 39(d) of the Constitution of India;
(b) Pass an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.1 University to grant the revised pay scale of Rs. 9300-34,800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200, as is being given to the other store-keepers, including the petitioner's juniors, employed in the University in the same category (doing same type of work)."
2. Petitioner was appointed to the post of Storekeeper in the Centre of Dental Studies with Jamia Millia Islamia University/ Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the `University') on recommendations of a Selection Committee in its Meeting held on 22.01.2007 in the pay scale Rs.4000-6000. After the 6th CPC recommendations were adopted by the University, Petitioner was placed in a replacement scale of Rs.5200-20200 with Grade Pay of Rs.2400/-. Petitioner continued to work in the said pay scale until he learnt that Storekeepers in different departments were being given the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- and thereafter Petitioner made a representation seeking revision of his pay scale on 16.11.2016.
3. Case of the Petitioner in a nutshell is that there is a clear discrimination within the Storekeepers in different departments of the University and therefore he should also be placed in the revised pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- at par with the other Storekeepers. Ms. Ghosh, counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that Storekeeper is a post which is part of the technical staff of the University and record would show that the post was given the pre-revised scale of Rs.1640-2900 under the 4th CPC which was revised to Rs.5500-9000 under 5th CPC and finally to Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/-as per the 6th CPC as per the CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008. In order to support this plea, Ms. Ghosh relies upon a letter dated 16.06.1997 which reads as follows:
"JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA
JAMIA NAGAR, NEW DELHI - 110 025
Registrar's Office
F.PO.Gen-26/Vol.5(v)/R.O./(ESTT.)/97 16/6/97
The Accounts Officer
Jamia Millia Islamia
NEW DELHI-25.
SUB.: Revision of pay scale in r/o Technical Staff
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated 10/3/97 on the subject noted above and to give below list of Technical Staff which is covered under the revision of scale of Rs. 1640-2900.
1. J.E.
2. Burser
3. Store-keeper
4. Planning/Statistical Asstt.
5. Technical Asstt.
6. Cartographer
7. Sr. Lab. Asstt.
8. Sports Coach
9. Garden Supervisor
10. Library Incharge
11. Photographer
The cases of Pharmacist and A.V. Operator are being examined separately and decision, in this regard shall be communicated separately.
Yours faithfully
Sd/-
17.6.97
(NIHALUDDIN SIDDIQUI)
Asstt. Registrar (Estt.)"
4. Additionally, Petitioner has also filed a tabular representation indicating the names of other Storekeepers in different departments of the University, who are in the pay band of Rs.9300-34800 with Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- and the chart is extracted hereunder, for ready reference:
| S.No. | Name of the Employee | Department Posted to | Pay Scale | GP | SR/JR |
| 01 | Mohd. Salaman Ashraf Chaudhry | Applied Science & Humanities | 5200-20200 | 2800 | SR |
| 9300-34800 | 4200 | ||||
| 02 | Mohd. Aslam | Bio-Science | 9300-34800 | 4200 | SR |
| 03 | Faisal Ashraf | Civil Engineering | 9300-34800 | 4200 | SR |
| 04 | Iqbal Hussain | Dentistry | 5200-20200 | 2400 | -- |
| 05 | Mirza Asad Baig | Engg. & Technology | 9300-34800 | JR | |
| 06 | Khalid Anis | Mechanical Engineering | 9300-34800 | 4200 | SR |
| 07 | S. Rais Mehdi Naqvi | University Politechnic | 9300-34800 | SR | |
| 08 | Adalat |
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
The judgment established the principle that once employees are in one cadre, the distinction between direct recruits and promotees disappears, and no discrimination can be made thereafter in fixing t....
The court emphasized the principle of equal pay for equal work, ruling that the petitioners were entitled to the same pay scale as their counterparts in other universities due to administrative error....
Autonomous institutions receiving public funding must adhere to the principles of equality in pay, ensuring parity for similar job roles under constitutional mandates.
Points Of Law : Any amounts paid to appellants under order of the Principal dated or even under the order of learned Single Judge (if any) will not be sought to be recovered from appellants.
The Pay Verification Cell lacks authority to unilaterally modify pay scales set by statutory committees, affirming the jurisdiction of University committees in pay fixation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the illegality of the appellant's appointment against a non-sanctioned post and the lack of approval from the State Government, leading to the dism....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.