Back
SACHIN DATTA
Indus Birra Beverages – Appellant
Versus
Arun Kumar Dwivedi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sachin Datta, J.
Factual Background
1. The present petition filed under Section 11(2), (5) & (6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ["the Act"] seeks appointment of an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes stated to have arisen between the parties.
2. The disputes between the parties have arisen in the context of a "Sub- Dealership Agreement" dated 18.03.2021 between the following parties:
(i) M/s Mahakaal Alcobrew (MA) (referred to in the aforesaid agreement as the `Distributor');
(ii) M/s RCR Filling Station, represented by Mr. Arun Kumar Dwivedi (the respondent herein and referred to in the aforesaid Agreement as the `Sub-Dealer');
(iii) M/s Indus Birra Beverages (IBB) (the petitioner herein and referred to in the aforesaid Agreement as the `Importer').
3. The Arbitration Clause in the said Agreement is in the following terms:
"19. Arbitration
'That any dispute/difference or claims arising out of or relating to the agreement or interpretation of any provision here of or the breadth here of, shall be referred to INDUS BIRRA BEVERAGES for resolution of the dispute however if the dispute remains unsolved, a sole arbitrator shall be appointed by eithe
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the disputes sought to be referred to arbitration were not precluded by the Cancellation Agreement and required a detailed examination by a du....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the arbitrability of disputes arising from a dealership agreement and the nature of relief that can be granted in arbitration, as governed by the A....
The existence of a dispute under the dealership agreement justifies the appointment of an arbitrator, even without a termination order being issued.
Courts examine the existence of an arbitration agreement at a preliminary stage without delving into substantive issues or contract novation; such matters are reserved for the Arbitrator.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the recognition of the di....
The Court's review of the arbitration agreement was limited to a prima facie standard, and the issue of the respondents' liability was held to be within the arbitrator's jurisdiction.
The main legal point established is that lack of consensus ad idem on the arbitration procedure can justify court appointment of an arbitrator, and previous adjudication does not necessarily bar arbi....
The court upheld the doctrine of kompetenzkompetenz, allowing the Arbitral Tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction, and emphasized the importance of arbitration clauses in agreements.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
