SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 4805

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anish Dayal, J.
Tahir Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail Appln. 3551 of 2020, Bail Appln. 2437 of 2021, Bail Appln. 2440 of 2021, Bail Appln. 2752 of 2021 & Bail Appln. 2807 of 2021
Decided On : 12-07-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Salman Khurshid, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rizwan, Ms. Sachi Chopra, Mr. Aadil Singh Bopara, Ms. Shama Usmani, Mr. Aman Khullak, Ms. Mariya Mansuri, Ms. Anshu Kapoor and Ms. Nistha Sinha, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.V. Raju, ASG for the State with Mr. Madhukar Pandey, SPP, Mr. Anshuman & Aditya, Advocates.

The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each of the 5 FIRs. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.

Headnote:

The Court granted bail to the petitioner in 5 FIRs related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The Court analyzed each FIR separately and found that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each case. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested in connection with 5 FIRs related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The FIRs alleged offenses such as rioting, arson, and attempt to murder. The petitioner was denied bail by the trial court.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each of the 5 FIRs. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in the 5 FIRs related to the 2020 Delhi riots.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each of the 5 FIRs. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.

Final Decision: The Court granted bail to the petitioner in the 5 FIRs.

JUDGMENT

Anish Dayal, J.

1. This judgment will dispose of 5 bail applications filed by the petitioner seeking regular bail in FIR No.80/2020 (Bail Appl.2752/2021), FIR No.91/2020 (Bail Appl.2440/2021), FIR No.92/2020 (Bail Appl.2437/2021), FIR No.117/2020 (Bail Appl.3551/2020) & FIR No.120/2020 (Bail Appl.2807/2021), all registered at P.S. Dayalpur. These bail petitions were argued collectively by the parties since they adverted to similar facts and circumstances. These FIRs have been filed under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code inter alia including sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 153A (promoting enmity), 307 (attempt to murder), 427 (mischief causing damage), 436 (mischief by fire/explosive with intent to destroy house, etc.), 505 (statements conducing public mischief) IPC.

2. For convenience of reference, the essential details relating to each of these FIRs are produced herein below in a tabulated form:

ParticularsFIR 80/2020 PS DayalpurFIR 91/2020 PS DayalpurFIR 92/2020 PS DayalpurFIR 117/2020 PS DayalpurFIR 120/2020 PS Dayalpur
Referenced in this judgement as -FIR No.1FIR No.2FIR No.3FIR No.4FIR No.5
ComplainantASI Hari LalASI Hukam SinghASI Hukam SinghZeeshanIrshad Ali
Date of Incident25.02.202025.02.202025.02.202025.02.202024.02.2020
General DiaryGD 45-AGD 163-AGD 151-AGD 37-AGD 40-A
(GD) Entry No.25.02.202025.02.202025.02.202004.03.202004.03.2020
Date of complaintGD entryGD entryGD entry28.02.202026.02.2020
Date of FIR25.02.202002.03.202002.03.202004.03.202004.03.2020
FIR u/Sections147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B IPC and u/S 3, 4 PDPP Act147, 148, 149, 153A, 307, 436, 505, 34, 120B IPC and u/S 27, 30 Arms Act147, 148, 149, 153A, 307, 436, 505, 34, 120B IPC and u/S 27, 30 Arms Act147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B IPC147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B IPC
Chargesheet18.07.202027.07.202027.07.202017.07.202017.07.2020
Date of Arrest22.04.202006.05.202006.05.202021.04.202021.04.2020
Discharged u/Section & Order dated436 IPC vide Order dt. 19.10.2022 by ASJ KKD436, 505 IPC vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD436, 505 IPC vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD--
Charges framed & Order datedNo120B r/w 147, 148, 153A, 302 & 120B r/w 147, 148, 307 IPC qua the Petitioner vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD149, 307, 120B IPC qua the Petitioner vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD in addition to charges framed u/S 147, 148, 153A IPC in similar incident in FIR 91/2020 PS DayalpurNoNo
Number of Witnesses4251533344
Total Number of Accused10661010
No. of co-accused besides Petitioner granted bail95599

Background Facts

3. These FIRs arose out of rioting incidents which occurred on 24th and 25th February, 2020 in parts of Delhi during alleged protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019. Two of these complaints were filed by different complainants relating to certain alleged incidents which took place during those riots, and three of the complaints were based on GD entries by police officials.

3.1. As regards FIR No.80/2020 (referred to as "FIR No.1" for convenient reference), it was registered by ASI Hari Lal on the basis of information received on PCR Call vide DD No.45A on 25th February, 2020, from one Irshad Ali. As per the information, it was reported that about 100 persons were standing with petrol bombs on the terrace of the petitioner's house in Gali No.5, Chand Bagh Pulia, Nigam Parishad and were throwing these at other houses. It was noted that there were a number of people gathered in that area raising slogans, pelting stones on the police, sound of firing bullets was coming from the road and the mob was not dispersing despite efforts of the police. There was panic and violence including arson and damage of property. Accordingly, the said FIR was registered. As per the status report, the incidents occurred on 25th February, 2020 between 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. at Chand Bagh Pulia. Till 28th February, 2020, no complainant came forward to lodge any complaint with respect to riots that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top