IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anish Dayal, J.
Tahir Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Bail Appln. 3551 of 2020, Bail Appln. 2437 of 2021, Bail Appln. 2440 of 2021, Bail Appln. 2752 of 2021 & Bail Appln. 2807 of 2021
Decided On : 12-07-2023
The Court granted bail to the petitioner in 5 FIRs related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The Court analyzed each FIR separately and found that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each case. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested in connection with 5 FIRs related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The FIRs alleged offenses such as rioting, arson, and attempt to murder. The petitioner was denied bail by the trial court.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each of the 5 FIRs. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in the 5 FIRs related to the 2020 Delhi riots.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail in each of the 5 FIRs. The Court considered factors such as the bailable nature of the offenses, the period of incarceration exceeding the maximum periods of sentence prescribed, all other co-accused having been given bail, charges not being framed in three of the FIRs even after 3 years, and the petitioner's attempts to call the police during the riots.
Final Decision: The Court granted bail to the petitioner in the 5 FIRs.
JUDGMENT
Anish Dayal, J.
1. This judgment will dispose of 5 bail applications filed by the petitioner seeking regular bail in FIR No.80/2020 (Bail Appl.2752/2021), FIR No.91/2020 (Bail Appl.2440/2021), FIR No.92/2020 (Bail Appl.2437/2021), FIR No.117/2020 (Bail Appl.3551/2020) & FIR No.120/2020 (Bail Appl.2807/2021), all registered at P.S. Dayalpur. These bail petitions were argued collectively by the parties since they adverted to similar facts and circumstances. These FIRs have been filed under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code inter alia including sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 153A (promoting enmity), 307 (attempt to murder), 427 (mischief causing damage), 436 (mischief by fire/explosive with intent to destroy house, etc.), 505 (statements conducing public mischief) IPC.
2. For convenience of reference, the essential details relating to each of these FIRs are produced herein below in a tabulated form:
| Particulars | FIR 80/2020 PS Dayalpur | FIR 91/2020 PS Dayalpur | FIR 92/2020 PS Dayalpur | FIR 117/2020 PS Dayalpur | FIR 120/2020 PS Dayalpur |
| Referenced in this judgement as - | FIR No.1 | FIR No.2 | FIR No.3 | FIR No.4 | FIR No.5 |
| Complainant | ASI Hari Lal | ASI Hukam Singh | ASI Hukam Singh | Zeeshan | Irshad Ali |
| Date of Incident | 25.02.2020 | 25.02.2020 | 25.02.2020 | 25.02.2020 | 24.02.2020 |
| General Diary | GD 45-A | GD 163-A | GD 151-A | GD 37-A | GD 40-A |
| (GD) Entry No. | 25.02.2020 | 25.02.2020 | 25.02.2020 | 04.03.2020 | 04.03.2020 |
| Date of complaint | GD entry | GD entry | GD entry | 28.02.2020 | 26.02.2020 |
| Date of FIR | 25.02.2020 | 02.03.2020 | 02.03.2020 | 04.03.2020 | 04.03.2020 |
| FIR u/Sections | 147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B IPC and u/S 3, 4 PDPP Act | 147, 148, 149, 153A, 307, 436, 505, 34, 120B IPC and u/S 27, 30 Arms Act | 147, 148, 149, 153A, 307, 436, 505, 34, 120B IPC and u/S 27, 30 Arms Act | 147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B IPC | 147, 148, 149, 427, 436, 120B IPC |
| Chargesheet | 18.07.2020 | 27.07.2020 | 27.07.2020 | 17.07.2020 | 17.07.2020 |
| Date of Arrest | 22.04.2020 | 06.05.2020 | 06.05.2020 | 21.04.2020 | 21.04.2020 |
| Discharged u/Section & Order dated | 436 IPC vide Order dt. 19.10.2022 by ASJ KKD | 436, 505 IPC vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD | 436, 505 IPC vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD | - | - |
| Charges framed & Order dated | No | 120B r/w 147, 148, 153A, 302 & 120B r/w 147, 148, 307 IPC qua the Petitioner vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD | 149, 307, 120B IPC qua the Petitioner vide Order dt. 13.10.2022 by ASJ KKD in addition to charges framed u/S 147, 148, 153A IPC in similar incident in FIR 91/2020 PS Dayalpur | No | No |
| Number of Witnesses | 42 | 51 | 53 | 33 | 44 |
| Total Number of Accused | 10 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 10 |
| No. of co-accused besides Petitioner granted bail | 9 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
Background Facts
3. These FIRs arose out of rioting incidents which occurred on 24th and 25th February, 2020 in parts of Delhi during alleged protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019. Two of these complaints were filed by different complainants relating to certain alleged incidents which took place during those riots, and three of the complaints were based on GD entries by police officials.
3.1. As regards FIR No.80/2020 (referred to as "FIR No.1" for convenient reference), it was registered by ASI Hari Lal on the basis of information received on PCR Call vide DD No.45A on 25th February, 2020, from one Irshad Ali. As per the information, it was reported that about 100 persons were standing with petrol bombs on the terrace of the petitioner's house in Gali No.5, Chand Bagh Pulia, Nigam Parishad and were throwing these at other houses. It was noted that there were a number of people gathered in that area raising slogans, pelting stones on the police, sound of firing bullets was coming from the road and the mob was not dispersing despite efforts of the police. There was panic and violence including arson and damage of property. Accordingly, the said FIR was registered. As per the status report, the incidents occurred on 25th February, 2020 between 2:00 to 4:00 p.m. at Chand Bagh Pulia. Till 28th February, 2020, no complainant came forward to lodge any complaint with respect to riots that
The court determined that the completion of investigation in a riot-related case allows for reconsideration of bail, even after previous denials, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence against....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of evidence, pending charges, and the expected trial duration in the decision to grant bail.
The court ruled that the serious nature of the charges, potential witness tampering, and public safety concerns justified the denial of bail.
Unlawful assembly - Grant of bail - No independent eye-witness identification of applicant.
The court established that in the absence of credible evidence linking the accused to the crime scene, bail should be granted, especially when trial proceedings are expected to be lengthy.
Bail is granted where the accused is not directly implicated in the crime, has no prior convictions, and continued detention is unwarranted due to the length of the trial process.
Point of Law : Grant of Bail - Petitioner cannot be made to languish behind bars for a longer period of time, and that veracity of allegations levelled against him can be tested during trial.
Theory of close-range shot is just a conjecture of the investigating agency and is not based on scientific fact.Simply because copper like pieces were found near the exit wound of the body, as per th....
Bail applications for serious offenses can be denied to prevent witness tampering, balancing individual liberty against public safety.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of direct evidence, credibility of witnesses, and the filing of the charge sheet in determining the grant of bail.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.