SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Subramonium Prasad, J.
Ajay @ Monu - Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
Bail Appln. 2608 of 2021, Bail Appln. 2660 of 2021 and Bail Appln. 3635 of 2021
Decided On : 10-12-2021




The court ruled that the serious nature of the charges, potential witness tampering, and public safety concerns justified the denial of bail.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 - Bail applications - Denial of bail on grounds of serious charges including murder and possibility of influencing witnesses - The court held that the potential for witness tampering and serious nature of offences warranted continued detention and a balance between personal liberty and public order considerations. (Paras 10, 26, 27)

(B) Bail jurisprudence - Factors for granting bail include seriousness of the charge, antecedents of the accused, and the possibility of interfering with the investigation or threatening witnesses - The court noted the petitioner's clean record but weighed it against the risks posed by his release in light of the charges. (Paras 10, 26)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner faced charges concerning murders during communal riots, with serious implications as multiple FIRs were filed regarding the deaths of individuals amidst violent clashes in February 2020. (Paras 4-3, 7-8)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the petitioner had significant evidence against him, including witness statements and CCTV footage placing him at the scene, raising concerns over bail. (Paras 20, 27)

Issues: The main issues included the nature of the charges, the credibility of eyewitness testimony, potential influence on witnesses, and balancing the rights of the accused with public safety. (Paras 10, 21, 26)

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of witness safety and public order, stating that bail could not be granted as it might compromise the trial and investigation, particularly given the serious nature of the charges. (Paras 26, 27)

Result: Bail applications dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of firs and incidents leading to bail applications (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. arguments and evidence surrounding eyewitness reliability (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. state's evidence against the petitioner during riots (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
4. discussion on forensic opinions and cctv evidence (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. balancing personal liberty and public order in bail decision (Para 26 , 27)
6. final order dismissing bail applications (Para 28)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J.

1. BAIL APPLN. 2608/2021 has been filed for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 158/2020 dated 21.03.2020 registered at Police Station Dayalpurfor offences under Section 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC.

2. BAIL APPLN. 2660/2021 has been filed for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 163/2020 dated 22.03.2020 registered at Police Station Dayalpurfor offences under Section 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC.

3. BAIL APPLN. 3635/2021has been filed for grant of regular bail in FIR No. 159/2020 dated 21.03.2020 registered at Police Station Dayalpur for offences under Section 147 , 148, 149, 302, 120B, 34 IPC.

4. The FIRs herein state that FIR No.77/2020 dated 26.02.2020 was registered at Police Station Dayalpur for offences under Section 147 , 148, 149, 302, 34 IPC as per which the bodies of four persons, namely, Zakir, Mehtaab, Ashfaaq Husain, Jameel were recovered during the riots which had taken place in North East Delhi in February 2020.

5. It is stated that during investigation, the bodies of the four deceased were identified and it appears that the time and place of their deaths were different. Accordingly, four different cases were registered. FIR No.158/2020 dated 21.03.2020 was registered with respect to the death of Zakir.

6. It is stated that during investigation, the brother of Zakir had told him to meet in the afternoon around 3:30 PM on the day of the alleged incident. It is stated that around 3:30 PM, the brother of the deceased left for a nearby masjid for namaz. It is stated that around 6:30 PM in the evening, he was informed that his brother has been admitted to MeherNursing Home by some unknown people and that he was in an injured condition. It is stated that the brother of the deceasedreached the hospital and was asked to take the deceased to another centre, but no vehicles were available. The deceased was then taken to GTB hospital where he was declared brought dead.

7. FIR No.159/2020 was registered on 21.03.2020 with respect to the death of Ashfaaq Hussain. It is stated that the brother of the deceased had been informed by one Zulfikar Siddiqui that his brother had been taken to a hospital near Shiv ViharTiraha. It is stated that the brother of the deceased was not aware of the people who brought the deceased to the hospital. It is stated that the brother of the deceased was informed that his brother had been admitted. It is stated that on 26 02.2020, deceased was taken to GTB Hospital vide MLC No. D-01 with alleged H/o being injured in the evening of 25.02.2020 and he was declared dead there.

8. FIR No.163/2020 dated 22.03.2020 was registered at Police Station Dayalpur for offences under Section 147 , 148, 149, 302, 34, 120B IPC with respect to the death of Mehtaab. It is stated that during investigation, the brother of the deceased informed the officials that he at around 2 P.M. on the day of the alleged incident, the deceased had ventured out to get milk. Around 6 P.M., the brother of the deceased was informed that the deceased had been admitted to Meher Nursing Home by some unknown individuals. On reaching the nursing home, the brother of the deceased was instructed to take the deceased to another hospital, however, he was unable to do the same as no ambulances were available. The deceased was later taken to GTB Hospital where he was declared brought dead.

9. Chargesheets have been filed in the aforementioned FIRs for offences under Section 144,147, 148, 149, 188, 302, 120

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top