Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Junaid – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context of the rioting incident. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's analysis and reasoning for the decision. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. final judgment and order regarding bail. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT
The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
1. The above-captioned petitions have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in case FIR No.84/2020, for the offences punishable under Sections 147 /148/149/153-A/302/395/397/452/454/505/506/120-B IPC, registered at PS Dayal Pur, North East District, Delhi.
2. The above-captioned petitions have been filed of the same incident and FIR and the evidence on record are the same against all the accused/petitioners, therefore, these petitions being decided by this common order. However, since facts are also same of all the petitioners, therefore, facts narrated in Bail Appln.3163/2020 filed by accused Junaid are being discussed while passing order in these petitions.
3. Case of the prosecution is that in the North East area of Delhi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
