Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
State – Appellant
Versus
Ajay @ Badakka – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The present application under Section 378(3) read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., 1973, has been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 24.06.2020 passed by the learned Court of Sessions in FIR No. 224/2017, registered at P.S. Gokalpuri, Delhi, for the offences under Sections 307/34 of the IPC.
2. The brief background of this case, as noted in the impugned judgment dated 24.06.2020 is as under:
"HC Virender posted at GTB Hospital on 09.06.2017 at about 10:00 gave information to Police Station Gokalpuri regarding admission of Rajender (hereinafter referred to as "the injured") in injured condition as the injured received stab injuries by a knife in a quarrel and said information was reduced into writing vide DD no. 20A. DD no. 20A was assigned to SI Ompal Singh (hereinafter referred to as "the investigating officer") who along with Ct. Nitin reached at GTB hospital and collected MLC of the injured who was found not fit for statement. Rukka was prepared. FIR bearing no. 224/17 under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as "IPC") was got registered. The Investigating officer reached at th
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove intention to cause culpable homicide under Section 307 IPC and the standard of proof for establishing guilt under Section ....
The central legal point established is the reliance on consistent and credible testimony, medical opinion, and socio-economic factors in determining the guilt and sentencing of the appellants.
Conviction under Section 307 IPC affirmed based on corroborated eyewitness testimony and evidence suggesting intent to kill, regardless of fatal injury. The appeal was dismissed.
The intent to commit murder must be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and in this case, it was established that the act fell under grievous hurt.
The prosecution failed to prove grievous injuries beyond reasonable doubt, leading to a modified conviction under Section 324 IPC with increased fines.
The court clarified that for a conviction under section 307 IPC, there must be clear evidence of intent to kill, which was not established in this case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove mens rea for the offence under Section 307 IPC and the interpretation of the nature of the injury in determining the ap....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of different sections of IPC, specifically Section 307, Section 326, and Section 448, in determining the appella....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
