IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.
Shri Akram Ali & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State & Anr. – Respondents
Cr.M.C. 4629 of 2022
Decided On : 05-07-2023
498A/406/34 IPC - Matrimonial Dispute - Settlement Agreement - B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179
Fact of the Case:
The petition seeks quashing of case FIR No. 388/2018 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Dwarka North, Delhi, filed by the respondent No.2/wife against the petitioners. The parties had a matrimonial dispute, but have amicably settled all their disputes, and the respondent No.2 has withdrawn her DV complaint.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the settlement agreement and the fact that the parties have been granted Talaq. It noted that the complainant no longer wishes to pursue the FIR and that continuing with the proceedings would serve no useful purpose. The court relied on previous judgments to support the decision to quash the FIR.
Issues: Quashing of FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute where the parties have amicably settled their disputes.
Ratio Decidendi: Cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Final Decision: The court quashed the case FIR No. 388/2018 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of case FIR No. 388/2018 dated 02.11.2018 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Dwarka North, Delhi. The said FIR was lodged on the complaint of respondent No.2/wife against the petitioners herein.
2. Facts in brief are that the marriage between petitioner No. 1/husband and respondent No. 2/complainant - wife was solemnized on 04.01.2017 as per Muslim rites and customs. No child was born out of the wedlock. Thereafter owing to temperamental differences both the parties started residing separately since 15.08.2017. Several efforts were made to reconcile the parties, however the same did not fructify. Consequently, the present FIR was lodged by the respondent No. 2 against the petitioners herein. Respondent No.2 also filed a complaint under the DV Act bearing MC No. 488/2018 titled Saira vs Akram Ali against the petitioner No.1.
3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioners submits that however, now the parties have amicably settled all their disputes in terms of the settlement agreement dated 30.10.2021 on the following terms and conditions.
"1. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that the first party shall pay a sum of Rs.3,60,000/- (Three lac sixty thousand) to the second party as full and final settlement amount qua all her claims (past, present and future) arising out of the said marriage on account of permanent alimony, Ishtridhan, dowry articles, maintenance, Mehar and miscellaneous expenses and all other claims in three installments.
2. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that the first party shall pay first installment of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty thousand) to the second party by way of demand draft at the time of signing this settlement agreement.
3. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that the first party shall pay second installment of Rs. l,00,000/- (One lac) to the second party at the time of recording of the statement for withdrawal of the case titled as Saira versus Akram Ali & Ors. pending in the Court of Ms. Richa Manchanda, M.M., Dwarka Courts, Delhi, out of which Rs.50,000/- (Fifty thousand) will be paid in cash and Rs.50,000/- (Fifty thousand) by way of demand draft.
4. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that the first party shall pay third/last installment of Rs.2,10,000/- (Two lac ten thousand) to the second party by way demand draft before High Court of Delhi at the time of hearing and recording of statement of the second party for quashing of said FIR lodged by the second party against the first party and his family members.
5. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that the application for withdrawing the case titled as Saira versus Akram Ali & Ors. pending in the Court of Ms. Richa Manchanda, M.M., Dwarka Courts, Delhi shall be filed within 15 days of execution of this settlement agreement. Thereafter the parties shall take Talaq as per law within one month. Thereafter the first party shall file the petition for quashing of FIR before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi within one month.
6. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that they shall not interfere in the life of each other in future.
7. It has been agreed and settled between the parties that in case of default by the second party in signing, appearing and making statement before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi For quashing of FIR and withdrawal of the case under D.V. Act, she shall return the amount received by her from the first party to the second party alongwith interest @ 12% per annum w.e.f. the date of receiving of the amount till actual payment and in case of default by the first party in filing petition before Hon'ble High Court of Delhi within stipulated time, he shall pay interest @ 12% per annum on the balance amount to the second party from the date of expiry of stipulated period till compliance of this settlement agreement.
8. It has been agreed and settled that aft
In matrimonial matters, amicable resolution and the prevention of court process abuse are crucial considerations for quashing FIRs and related proceedings.
In matrimonial matters, amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage as per personal law can lead to quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, and the court should ensure that the settlement is voluntary and without coercion.
Settlement and withdrawal of complaints in matrimonial disputes can be valid grounds for quashing FIRs and criminal proceedings.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest if the parties have arrived at a genuine settlement, as established in previous judgments.
Genuine settlement in matrimonial disputes should lead to quashing of FIR and subsequent proceedings.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to rest if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement, as established in relevant case law.
Matrimonial disputes should be put to quietus if the parties have arrived upon a genuine settlement.
In matrimonial matters, genuine settlement and mutual divorce can be valid grounds for quashing FIR and proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.