NEERAJ TIWARI
Braj Bhushan Lal Awasthi – Appellant
Versus
Urmila (Since Deceased) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Kirti Kumar Nirkhi, learned counsel for opposite party.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs :-
(II) Direct the court below to allow the amendment application (paper No. 289-Ka) dated 08.04.2013 filed by the petitioner before the Trial Court.”
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that plaintiff-petitioner has filed Original Suit No. 2 of 1993 along with interim injunction application in the year 1993 for cancellation of sale deed, which was rejected vide order dated 08.02.1994. Against the said rejection order, plaintiff-petitioner preferred Appeal No. 173/1994. During the pendency of appeal, plaintiff-petitioner has filed amendment application for amending the plaint. The said appeal as well as amendment application was rejected. Against both the orders, plaintiff-petitioner has preferred Writ Petition No. 28148 of 1998 befo
Mahila Ramkali Devi and others vs. Nandram (D) Thr. Lrs. and others; 2015 0 Supreme(SC) 438
Mount Mary Enterprises vs. M/s. Jivratna Medi Treat Pvt. Ltd.; 2015 0 Supreme(SC) 89
North Eastern Railway Administration
Prithi Pal Singh & another vs. Amrik Singh & others; 2013 0 Supreme(SC) 158
Rajkumar Gurawara (Dead) through L.Rs v. S.K. Sarwagi and Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.; (2008) 14 SCC 364
Revajeetu Builders and Developers v. Narayanaswamy and Sons and Ors. (2009) 10 SCC 84
Rameshkumar Agarwal vs. Rajmala Exports Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.; 2012 0 Supreme(SC) 270
State Bank of Hyderabad vs. Town Municipal Council; 2007 (1) SCC 765
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.