SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3242

VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Sudeep Raj Saini – Appellant
Versus
High Court of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Chhindra and Ms. Sanya Kumar, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Dr. Amit George, Mr. Piyo Harold Jaimon, Mr. Rayadurgam Bharat, Mr. Amol Acharya and Mr. Arkaneil Bhaumik, Advocates for R-1.
Mr. Nimish Chib, Advocate, for R-3.
Mr. Abhinav Vashisht and Mr. Sacchin Puri, Senior Advocates with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma, Mr. Tarun Dabas, Ms. Akshita Jaitley, Mr. Manish Kumar Bhardwaj, Mr. Devvart Sharma and Mr. Naveen, Advocates, for R-4.
Mr. Abhinav Vashisht and Mr. Sacchin Puri, Senior Advocates with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sharma and Ms. Akshita Sachdeva Jaitley, Advocates, for R-5.
Mr. Sahil Khurana, Advocate in CM (M) 13170/2023, for the Respondent.

Table of Content
1. introduction and context of the petition (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. procedural aspects of dhjs examination (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. candidates' qualification for the viva voce (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. candidates' challenges and petitions (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. awarding of additional marks (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
6. final selections and ranking (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
7. petitioner's arguments against additional marks (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. respondents' counterarguments (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41)
9. criteria for qualification under dhjs rules (Para 82 , 83 , 84 , 85)
10. engagement with the department of legal affairs (Para 86 , 87 , 88 , 89)
11. nature of legal consultant work (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 93)
12. assessment of employment status (Para 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98)
13. supreme court precedent on employment definition (Para 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103)
14. conclusion on respondent 5's eligibility (Para 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108)
15. final judgment and orders (Para 109 , 110 , 111)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J.

INTRODUCTION

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, impu


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top