SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, VINOD DIWAKAR
Vivek Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Shri Vivek Kumar Sharma (petitioner no.1) and Shri Praveen Singh (petitioner no.2), in person; Shri Ashish Mishra, learned counsel for the High Court and Shri Arimardan Singh Rajput, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed seeking a direction upon the High Court, to moderate and revise the marks awarded to the petitioners at the scale of average marks awarded by the two Boards constituted for the purpose of conducting the interviews at the U.P.H.J.S. 2016 Examination. Further direction has been sought to thereafter consider the petitioners for appointment on the post of Additional District Judge.
3. First, it may be noted, the petitioners are practising Advocates. They have chosen to pursue the writ proceedings, in person. Yet, they have filed numerous pleadings. Many of those are repetitive and not on the format prevalent, here. Therefore, at the beginning of the hearing itself, we sought a clarification (from both the petitioners), as to the documents and affidavits they seek to rely. It was then stated by the petit
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke and Others Vs. Dr. B.S. Mahajan and Others (1990) 1 SCC 305
State of Bihar & Ors. vs Bihar Rajya Bhumi Vikas Bank Samiti
Topline Shoes Ltd. Vs. Corporation Bank
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Kumar Yadav & Ors. vs State of Haryana & Ors.
Sardara Singh vs State of Punjab
Hirandra Kumar Vs. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.