Back
UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARAN
State of Uttar Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Atul Kumar Dwivedi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of recruitment process for police selection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. description of examination structure and scoring guidelines. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. challenges against the recruitment process normalization details. (Para 7) |
| 4. petitions filed contesting inclusion criteria based on scores. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's assertion on eligibility based on normalized scores. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. discussion on judicial review of normalization method. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. reevaluation of normalization in basis for scoring fairness. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. principles regarding competition in examinations with variable papers. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 9. conclusion of state's appeal decision on normalization applicability. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 10. final decision on the legality of normalization across different batches. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
Uday Umesh Lalit, J.
1. These appeals arise out of the final judgment and order dated 11.09.2019 passed by the High Court1[High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Application No.23733 of 2018 and all other connected matters].
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
