Back
YASHWANT VARMA, DHARMESH SHARMA
Resident Welfare Association Kapashera – Appellant
Versus
Sub Divisional Magistrate Kapashera – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dharmesh Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. This judgement shall decide a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant Resident Welfare Association Kapashera in terms of Clause X of Letters Patent of Lahore (as applicable to the Delhi High Court) read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Courts Act, 1996, challenging the final judgment/order dated 22 February 2021 passed in W.P.(C) No. 4927/2020 in case titled Smt. Geeta Singh & Anr. v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate (Kapashera) & Ors., passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the Writ Petition was disposed of with certain directions allowing respondent No. 2 Kapashera Estates. Resident Welfare Association to erect gates at points `A' and `B' (as indicated in the map, which form part of the judgment) on a public road in Kapashera Estate, New Delhi.
BRIEF FACTS:
2. Briefly stated, respondent No. 3 Smt. Geeta Singh was at logger head with the respondent No. 2 Kapashera Estates. Resident Welfare Association over installation of gates at points `A' and `B' on a public road in Kapashera Estates.. The Writ Petition No. 4927/2020 was filed by respondent No.3 Smt. Geeta Singh wife of late Sh. N.B. Singh, seeking quashing of order dated 16 July
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for permission under the Delhi Municipal Act, 1954, and Guidelines dated 25 June 2007 for the installation of gates on public ro....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the installation of gates should be based on contributions from all farmhouse residents, as directed by the court.
Installation of residential security gates must comply with municipal regulations and account for collective security interests of all property residents.
Administrative bodies must ensure a right to fair hearing as part of procedural justice, particularly when decisions affect stakeholders, or previous directions from the court are not followed.
The Appellate Court cannot, in an appeal against an interim order, appoint a commissioner to collect evidence on merits or pre-emptively decide factual disputes that are explicitly reserved for full ....
The court emphasized the need to maintain equitable balance between the parties and found that the installation of railings by the defendants violated the previous court order, leading to interferenc....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
