SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Geeta Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sub Divisional Magistrate (Kapashera) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to installation of gates (Para 2 , 4)
2. arguments on rwa membership & gate costs (Para 5 , 6 , 11)
3. court's observations on gate installations (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. conclusion and order issued by the court (Para 12)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioners, who are resident of Kapashera Estate i.e., Petitioner No.1 is resident of Farm House No.1, Kapashera Estate, New Delhi and Petitioner No.2 is resident of Farm House No.1A, Kapashera Estate, New Delhi. By way of the present petition, both the Petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 16th July, 2020 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate ("SDM"), Kapashera in respect of installation of gates in the Estate. The operation portion of the SDM's order is set out herein below:

    "Observation:

    After hearing both the parties and all the above facts as well as keeping in mind the safety and security of all residents living in the Kapashera Estate, the undersigned is of view that the request of RWA Association Kapashera is liable to be allowed and hereby allowed that the gate should be instal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top