Back
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, MANOJ JAIN
Jitender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--Petitioner seeks quashing of the Detailed Medical Examination result dated 02.06.2023 and the Review Medical Examination result dated 05.06.2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been rejected on the ground of `tachycardia' and Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB). It has also been contended that "Revised Uniform Guidelines for review in medical examination in Central Armed Police Forces and Assam Rifles for GOs and NGOs" dated 31.05.2021 have not been followed in this regard.
3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
4. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal.
5. Reference may be had to the abovesaid guidelines prescribed for the Review Medical Board which, inter-alia, reads as under:
"7(e) For candidates who have been rejected on the ground of hypertension/tachycardia should have been admitted/hospitalized by the Board before giving their final opinion regarding the candidate's fitness or otherwise. The hospitalization report should indicate whether the rise in blood pressure is of transient in nature due to excitement
Non-compliance with medical examination guidelines led to the setting aside of the Review Medical Board's findings and the direction to constitute a fresh Review Medical Board in accordance with the ....
Non-compliance with medical examination guidelines renders the opinion of the Review Medical Board unacceptable.
Failure to follow medical examination guidelines can result in the setting aside of the examination findings and the direction to constitute a fresh examination board.
Failure to follow guidelines for medical examination can lead to the setting aside of findings and the direction to constitute a fresh Review Medical Board.
Failure to follow guidelines for medical examination can lead to setting aside of the findings of the Review Medical Board and direction to constitute a fresh Review Medical Board.
Non-compliance with guidelines for review in medical examination led to the rejection of the petitioner on the ground of hypertension without proper examination and hospitalization, resulting in the ....
Compliance with medical examination guidelines is essential for rendering a valid opinion on a candidate's fitness.
Non-compliance with prescribed medical examination guidelines can lead to the setting aside of the medical board's findings and the direction to constitute a fresh board for re-examination.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
