SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1391

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Rajeev Futela – Appellant
Versus
Gurcharan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Karan Veer Tyagi and Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral):

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugns the order dated 13.03.2023 passed by the Civil Judge-01, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi (`Trial Court') in CS SCJ 2170/2021, dismissing the Petitioner's application filed under Order IX Rule 7 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC').

2. The Petitioner herein is the defendant and the Respondent is the plaintiff in the civil suit.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has placed on record the orders passed by the Trial Court and the orders passed by the Appellate Court under cover of an index dated 01.08.2023, the same are taken on record.

3.1 The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the civil suit has been filed by the Respondent, herein for recovery of Rs. 1,96,975/- (Rupees one lakh Ninety-Six Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy-Five Rupees Only) with respect to the goods dispatched to the Petitioner by the Respondent.

3.2 He states that it is the defence of the Petitioner herein that the payment towards the goods delivered stands paid and the Petitioner herein is in possession of a receipt executed by the Respondent, which duly evi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top